1981
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198109000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Shoulder Abduction Test in the Diagnosis of Radicular Pain in Cervical Extradural Compressive Monoradiculopathies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In two studies [21,62], it was necessary to recalculate these figures using the raw numbers presented. Diagnostic odds-ratio's (DOR's) were not calculated because of the recent suggestion that a DOR does not meaningfully describe a marker's ability to classify subjects [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In two studies [21,62], it was necessary to recalculate these figures using the raw numbers presented. Diagnostic odds-ratio's (DOR's) were not calculated because of the recent suggestion that a DOR does not meaningfully describe a marker's ability to classify subjects [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded 354 studies on the basis of their titles and abstracts. We then retrieved and reviewed 12 full reports for possible inclusion [4,19,21,35,42,48,51,55,59,60,62,63]. Four studies were excluded because they examined either reliability or repeatability of the test, but not diagnostic accuracy [4,19,35,48].…”
Section: Data Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations