The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual Formulation and Methodology for the Development of a Health Status Measure

Bergner, Marilyn; Bobbitt, Ruth A.; Kressel, Shirley; Pollard, William E.; Gilson, Betty S.; Morris, Joanne

doi:10.2190/rhe0-ggh4-410w-la17

Cited by 580 publications

(191 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

184

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The differences were significant for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, social functioning. In a smaller third trial of only 53 patients, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) [8] and the Pain-o-Meter [40] were applied to compare the 6-week results after TAPP or Lichtenstein repair (1b) [40]. The laparoscopic group had less pain postoperatively and returned to work earlier, but the differences were not significant.…”

Section: Long-term Restoration Of Qol Is Not Different (El 1a)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Measuring health-related quality of life (QoL) after surgery is essential for decision making by patients, surgeons, and payers. The aim of this consensus conference was twofold. First, it was to determine for which diseases endoscopic surgery results in better postoperative QoL than open surgery. Second, it was to recommend QoL instruments for clinical research. Methods: An expert panel selected 12 conditions in which QoL and endoscopic surgery are important. For each condition, studies comparing endoscopic and open surgery in terms of QoL were identified. The expert panel reached consensus on the relative benefits of endoscopic surgery and recommended generic and disease-specific QoL instruments for use in clinical research. Results: Randomized trials indicate that QoL improves earlier after endoscopic than open surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), cholecystolithiasis, colorectal cancer, inguinal hernia, obesity (gastric bypass), and uterine disorders that require hysterectomy. For spleen, prostate, malignant kidney, benign colorectal, and benign non-GERD esophageal diseases, evidence from nonrandomized trials supports the use of laparoscopic surgery. However, many studies failed to collect long-term results, used nonvalidated questionnaires, or measured QoL components only incompletely.

show abstract

Section: Long-term Restoration Of Qol Is Not Different (El 1a)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A person who responds yes at the first administration of the scale would logically answer yes in all subsequent administrations. Therefore, this item is not responsive to changes in emotional function, or suicide risk [17,40].…”

Section: Responsivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rating scales can also be classified as generic measures and condition specific measures. Generic scales measure aspects of health-related functioning, such as mobility (TUG test) [7], quality of life [Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)] [16], and physical and social health (Sickness Impact Profile) [17]. Condition-specific scales, as the name implies, measure changes in 1 or more aspects of the specific condition of interest, reflecting aspects of function that are associated with that condition.…”

Section: Assessing the Clinical Relevance Of Functional Rating Scalesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Spectrum of Functional Rating Scales in Neurology Clinical Trials

Narayanaswami

2017

Neurotherapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The selection of an appropriate outcome measure is crucial to the success of a clinical trial, in order to obtain accurate results, which, in turn, influence patient care and future research. Outcomes that can be directly measured are mortality/survival. More frequently, neurology clinical trials evaluate outcomes that cannot be directly measured, such as disability, cognitive function, or change in symptoms of the condition under study. These complex outcomes are abstract ideas or latent constructs and are measured using rating scales. Functional rating scales typically assess the ability of patients to perform tasks and roles for everyday life. Rating scales should be valid (measure what they are supposed to measure), reliable (provide similar results if administered under the same conditions), and responsive (able to detect clinically important changes over time). The clinical relevance of rating scales depends on their ability to detect a minimal clinically important difference, and should be distinguished from statistical significance. Most rating scales are ordinal scales and have limitations. Modern psychometric methods of Rasch analysis and item response theory, termed latent trait theory, are increasingly being utilized to convert ordinal data to interval measurements, both to validate existing scales and to develop new scales. Patient-reported outcomes are being increasingly used in clinical trials and have a role in clinical quality assessment. The PROMIS and NeuroQoL databases are excellent resources for rigorously developed and validated patientreported outcomes.

show abstract

“…A QoL questionnaire was developed based on existing, validated questionnaires focusing on the earlier reported psychological side effects of screening [6,7,8,9,10]. By adding a number of psychosocial items, a more generic concept of QoL to the questionnaire was achieved.…”

Section: Quality Of Life Questionnaire For Population Screening (Scrementioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of Two Global and Generic Quality of Life Questionnaires for Population Screening: SCREENQOL and SEQOL

Ventegodt

Henneberg

Merrick

et al. 2003

The Scientific World JOURNAL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual Formulation and Methodology for the Development of a Health Status Measure

Cited by 580 publications

References 16 publications

Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery

Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery

The Spectrum of Functional Rating Scales in Neurology Clinical Trials

Validation of Two Global and Generic Quality of Life Questionnaires for Population Screening: SCREENQOL and SEQOL

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About