2021
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000007674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Silicone Turkish Delight for Dorsal Augmentation in Rhinoplasty

Abstract: Rhinoplasties are the most challenging facial aesthetic procedures with the majority of the cases requiring dorsal augmentation either in the form of autogenous or alloplastic materials. Although autogenous grafts are the gold standard, these grafts have their innate issues such as donor site morbidity, occasional displacement, resorption, tendency to warp or develop sharp edges over time with increased perceptibility and clinical visibility of the graft with time. These issues were addressed by Erol in 2000 w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the operation, there are several choices for wrapping materials, which include perichondrium, 14 temporalis muscle fascia 50 and rectus muscle fascia 8 . Although many clinical trials have compared the effect of various materials in longer terms, there is still no gold standard among such materials 51,52 . These wrapping materials as autogenous tissues possess favourable biocompatibility, but with certain limitations regarding the application and effect, including the available quantity, aggravation of injury, prolonging of operating time and complications at the donor site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the operation, there are several choices for wrapping materials, which include perichondrium, 14 temporalis muscle fascia 50 and rectus muscle fascia 8 . Although many clinical trials have compared the effect of various materials in longer terms, there is still no gold standard among such materials 51,52 . These wrapping materials as autogenous tissues possess favourable biocompatibility, but with certain limitations regarding the application and effect, including the available quantity, aggravation of injury, prolonging of operating time and complications at the donor site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 Although many clinical trials have compared the effect of various materials in longer terms, there is still no gold standard among such materials. 51 , 52 These wrapping materials as autogenous tissues possess favourable biocompatibility, but with certain limitations regarding the application and effect, including the available quantity, aggravation of injury, prolonging of operating time and complications at the donor site. Therefore, we have proposed to use the SIS or U‐SIS membranes as wrapping materials for diced cartilage graft, and proved that both could promote chondrogenesis and suppress dedifferentiation of chondrocyte in vitro, increase the survival of diced cartilage in short terms, and improve its regeneration in longer terms in rabbit models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the cartilage of the back of the hand cannot be completely deformed by reverse suturing, it can be used to avoid the deformation of the rib and medulla. 4 Therefore, we used the ePTFE materials together with costal cartilage to avoid the problem. The ePTFE material will not deform in the back of the nose, with fast operation speed and good effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But using autologous costal cartilage for the surgery also has drawbacks such as the deformation of the cartilage. Even if the cartilage of the back of the hand cannot be completely deformed by reverse suturing, it can be used to avoid the deformation of the rib and medulla 4. Therefore, we used the ePTFE materials together with costal cartilage to avoid the problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%