This chapter enquires into the complex conditions in which critically thinking artists find themselves in contemporary Russia, and the ways in which they carve out spaces for activist aesthetics, within their local situation as well as the global environment of uncertainty-the regime of what is nowadays called "post-truth."The strategies and tactics employed by the younger generation 1 of Russian artists seeking to maintain artistic freedom and dignity in the context of pervasive nationalism, state-supported neo-traditionalism, and an aggressive market economy recall some of the survival techniques that were used by artists who lived and worked during the late Soviet period. This recall, however, involves creative rethinking since the situation of increasing state control and isolation from the West, though reminiscent of the Soviet past, is also substantially different. Becoming part of an underground, as in Soviet times, 2 ceased to be an option as the state itself has appropriated postmodern techniques of ironic subversion, using them for cynically undermining the politics of truth. 3 This has largely disabled the non-conformist practices of ambiguity and transgression that had been developed during the late Soviet period. Beyond the changing configurations of power and mimicry on the national scale, it is necessary to consider transnational and global shifts of the political. Under the current conditions of globalized neoliberalism, "the place of modern liberal politics is dispersed," 4 which, along with pluralization of expression, involves the diffi culty of forming solidarities. At the same time, in Jean and John Comaroff's rethinking of the above perspective "from the South," the contemporary "capitalist imperium … has no real exteriors, … it has many peripheries." 5 For artists from global peripheries, this constellation provides mostly nation-bound and identity-based niches, both on transna tional and national markets, thus limiting their works' critical edge. 6 My readings of resilience practices in artworks engage the strategies of resisting these interlaced pressures of the state and the market.Such strategies require simultaneously being in-and outside the varied and intersecting discursive fields delineated by national and global powers. It is not unexpected, then, that in devising these strategies contemporary artists tap into the practices of late Soviet art and life which perfected borderline positionality-what Alexei Yurchak, 7 applying Mikhail Bakhtin's term vnenakhodimost, has called "inside/outside-ness" (following the English translations of Bakhtin's term as "outsideness," 8 I use this shorter version). Drawing on Mark Lipovetsky's conceptualization of tricksterism 9 as a central metaphor of Soviet and post-Soviet (particularly post-2000) culture of adaptation and survival, I read Kirill Savchenkov's installation The Horizon Community Memorial Centre as recalling and rethinking the work and life of late Soviet conceptual artists-and elabor ating new tricksterism.