2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Star Formation History of the Large Magellanic Cloud

Abstract: We present the first-ever global, spatially-resolved reconstruction of the star formation history (SFH) of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), based on the application of our StarFISH analysis software to the multiband photometry of twenty million of its stars from the Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey. The general outlines of our results are consistent with previously published results: following an initial burst of star formation, there was a quiescent epoch from approximately 12 to 5 Gyr ago. Star formatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

59
520
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 461 publications
(586 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
59
520
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Commander free-free amplitude at 10 GHz is 141 Jy, which gives an SFR of 0.10 M yr −1 ; the LSF model gives 0.08 M yr −1 , and the LSF-CMB model gives 0.09 M yr −1 . These are lower than the estimate of 0.2 M yr −1 for the average SFR from analyses of stellar populations by Harris & Zaritsky (2009) and Rezaeikh et al (2014), but agree well with the recent star formation rate of 0.06 M yr −1 calculated by Whitney et al (2008) based on young stellar objects; these authors also give a range of SFR estimates of 0.05-0.25 M yr −1 from infrared and Hα data. However, all of these estimates correspond to an SFR over different timescales (e.g., Murphy et al 2012), as well as being subject to systematic effects; a more detailed study would be necessary to disentangle these effects.…”
Section: Lmc and Smcsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The Commander free-free amplitude at 10 GHz is 141 Jy, which gives an SFR of 0.10 M yr −1 ; the LSF model gives 0.08 M yr −1 , and the LSF-CMB model gives 0.09 M yr −1 . These are lower than the estimate of 0.2 M yr −1 for the average SFR from analyses of stellar populations by Harris & Zaritsky (2009) and Rezaeikh et al (2014), but agree well with the recent star formation rate of 0.06 M yr −1 calculated by Whitney et al (2008) based on young stellar objects; these authors also give a range of SFR estimates of 0.05-0.25 M yr −1 from infrared and Hα data. However, all of these estimates correspond to an SFR over different timescales (e.g., Murphy et al 2012), as well as being subject to systematic effects; a more detailed study would be necessary to disentangle these effects.…”
Section: Lmc and Smcsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Based on size-of-sample effects (e.g., Gieles & Bastian 2008) we would expect that the SFR of the LMC was ∼ 4 times higher while the eMSTO clusters were forming (c.f., Maschberger & Kroupa 2011). However, no such increase in the SFH, based on resolved stars, is seen from 1 − 2 Gyr ago relative to today in the LMC (e.g., Harris & Zaritsky 2009;Weisz et al 2013). The lack of increase in the SFH from 1 − 2 Gyr is consistent with the fact that the clusters in this age range would have been born with similar masses (at the upper end of the mass function) as that observed in the YMCs in the LMC today.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The spiral galaxy is characterized by a continuous SFR which is higher than the one of irregulars. The models are able to reproduce the present day SFR observed in irregulars (Chomiuk & Povich 2011) and spirals (Harris & Zaritsky 2009). In the other panels of the Figure, the evolution of various processes related to dust evolution (stellar production, accretion, and destruction) are shown.…”
Section: The Reference Modelsmentioning
confidence: 90%