The state of mixed methods research in nursing: A focused mapping review and synthesis

Abstract

Aims To consider the scope and quality of mixed methods research in nursing. Design Focused mapping review and synthesis (FMRS). Data sources Five purposively selected journals: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, and Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Review methods In the target journals, titles and abstracts from papers published between 2015–2018 were searched for the words or derivative words ‘mixed methods’. Additional keyword searches were undertaken using each journal's search tool. We included studies that investigated nursing and reported to use a mixed methods approach. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were read in full and information was extracted onto a predetermined pro forma. Findings across journals were then synthesized to illustrate the current state of mixed methods research in nursing. Results We located 34 articles that reported on mixed methods research, conducted across 18 countries. Articles differed significantly both within and across journals in terms of conformity to a mixed methods approach. We assessed the studies for the quality of their reporting as regard the use of mixed methods. Nineteen studies were rated as satisfactory or good, with 15 rated as poorly described. Primarily, a poor rating was due to the absence of stating an underpinning methodological approach to the study and/or limited detail of a crucial integration phase. Conclusions Our FMRS revealed a paucity of published mixed methods research in the journals selected. When they are published, there are limitations in the detail given to the underpinning methodological approach and theoretical explanation.

Improvements following multimodal pelvic floor physical therapy in gynecological cancer survivors suffering from pain during sexual intercourse: Results from a one-year follow-up mixed-method study

“…The main strength of this study is the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods to allow data triangulation and complementarity to fully capture the treatment effects [77][78][79]. Validated scales and questionnaires were used to assess the quantitative outcomes.…”

The Second Side of the Coin—Resilience, Meaningfulness and Joyful Moments in Home Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…This is the first study that investigates resilience, meaning of work and joyful moments in home health care workers. Considering that mixed-methods designs are not well established in nursing literature [ 87 , 88 ], the detailed presentation of the applied mixed-methods design may give a best-practice example that could be evolved through further research.…”

Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool: Strengthening the Methodological Rigor of Mixed Methods Research Studies in Nursing

“…In some parts of the world, there is a tendency for nurses to favor studies that are grounded in positivism -a fact that can be explained by the strong influence of the biomedical model in the profession [8][9] . However, it is known that the plurality of scientific research in nursing is real.…”

“…Although there has been an increase in the use of mixed methods methodology in nursing, the research process including data integration and findings dissemination are, in general, still embryonic among nurse researchers in many parts of the world 9,14 . Evidence shows that some mixed methods studies in nursing seem to have methodological weaknesses, including a lack of clarity and insufficient information as to the purpose; research design/justification; weights assigned to the quantitative and qualitative arms and data integration strategies 9,14 .…”