The stepwise process of integrating a genetic counsellor into primary care

Abstract

Genetic services have historically been housed in tertiary care, requiring referral, which can present access barriers. While integrating genetics into primary care could facilitate access, many primary care physicians lack genomics expertise. Integrating genetic counsellors (GCs) into primary care could theoretically address these issues, but little is known about how to do this effectively. To understand and describe the process of integrating a GC into a multidisciplinary primary care setting, we qualitatively explored the perceptions, attitudes and reactions of existing team members prior to, and after the introduction of a GC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted immediately prior to (T1), and 9 months after (T2), the GC joining the clinic. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed concurrently with data collection using interpretive description. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 17 participants (13 at T1, 11 at T2). Participants described several distinct, progressive stages of interaction with the GC: Disinterest or Resistance, Pre-Collaboration, Initial Collaboration, and Effective Collaboration/Integration of the GC into the team. At each stage, specific needs had to be met in order to advance to the next stage of collaboration. A variety of barriers and facilitators attended movement between different stages of the model. The Stepwise Process of Integration Model describes the process through which primary care staff and clinicians integrate a GC into their practice. The insight provided by this model could be used to facilitate more effective integration of GCs into other primary care settings.

Exploring Rare Disease Patient Attitudes and Beliefs regarding Genetic Testing: Implications for Person-Centered Care

“…Indeed, translational roadblocks contributing to the seventeen-year lag from discovery to implementation into practice are well known [ 34 ]. Recently, implementation frameworks have been developed to better integrate genetic services into primary care [ 35 ]. Such efforts may help ameliorate some of the referral barriers expressed by focus group participants.…”

Stakeholders Perceptions of Barriers to Precision Medicine Adoption in the United States

“…Genetic counselors can describe how biomarker testing can help guide treatment decisions and can help patients understand their own results. Though adding genetic counseling to cancer care teams is an effective healthcare delivery model shown to improve patient care [ 12 ], there are hurdles to implementing more use of genetic counselling. Challenges include a lack of genetic counselors with only 1.49 genetic counselors per 100,000 people in the US and disparities to access genetic counselling services by regional location, socioeconomic status, and cancer type [ 13 ].…”

Examining interprofessional collaboration in oncogenetic service delivery models for hereditary cancers: a scoping review protocol

“…This framework suggests a threelevel typology of collaboration (ie, active collaboration, developing collaboration and potential collaboration) based on 10 indicators, 65 and it has been successfully used to guide the examination of the process of integrating a genetic counsellor into a multidisciplinary primary care setting in Canada. 66 Accordingly, availability and details on four dimensions of the collaboration intervention will be examined in the documents selected, including:…”

“…2008 framework65 will be used to examine the level of collaboration proposed by the different interventions. This framework suggests a three-level typology of collaboration (ie, active collaboration, developing collaboration and potential collaboration) based on 10 indicators,65 and it has been successfully used to guide the examination of the process of integrating a genetic counsellor into a multidisciplinary primary care setting in Canada 66. Accordingly, availability and details on four dimensions of the collaboration intervention will be examined in the documents selected, including: (1) the existence of shared goals and vision (ie, goals and client-centred orientation vs other allegiances); (2) internalisation (ie, mutual acquaintanceship and trust); (3) formalisation of procedures and their outputs to clarify expectations and responsibilities (ie, formalisation tools and information exchange); and (4) governance (ie, centrality, leadership, support for innovation and connectivity) 65…”