2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stiffness and phase frequency response of taenia coli smooth muscle: Comparison of the step and sinusoidal perturbation analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dip or minimum of the plot of stiffness vs frequency of oscillation represents the cross-bridge cycling rate [14], and has been demonstrated to occur at 10-13 Hz for frog sartorius muscle [21], 10 Hz for rabbit psoas muscle [14] and 1-2 Hz for cardiac papillary muscle [22]. Ozturk's group [23] found that stiffness and phase frequency characteristics of taenia coli smooth muscle were similar to cardiac and skeletal muscle, and these investigators detected a dip (minimum) in the stiffness vs frequency relationship of 0.0012 Hz. On the other hand, the behavior of the stiffness and phase vs frequency of oscillation was different in our experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dip or minimum of the plot of stiffness vs frequency of oscillation represents the cross-bridge cycling rate [14], and has been demonstrated to occur at 10-13 Hz for frog sartorius muscle [21], 10 Hz for rabbit psoas muscle [14] and 1-2 Hz for cardiac papillary muscle [22]. Ozturk's group [23] found that stiffness and phase frequency characteristics of taenia coli smooth muscle were similar to cardiac and skeletal muscle, and these investigators detected a dip (minimum) in the stiffness vs frequency relationship of 0.0012 Hz. On the other hand, the behavior of the stiffness and phase vs frequency of oscillation was different in our experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%