2020
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08749-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strangest proton?

Abstract: We present an improved determination of the strange quark and antiquark parton distribution functions of the proton by means of a global QCD analysis that takes into account a comprehensive set of strangeness-sensitive measurements: charm-tagged cross sections for fixed-target neutrino–nucleus deep-inelastic scattering, and cross sections for inclusive gauge-boson production and W-boson production in association with light jets or charm quarks at hadron colliders. Our analysis is accurate to next-to-next-to-le… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…W + c production at the LHC is a powerful probe for the strange PDF [46] and its asymmetry [47] because at tree-level and for the dominant CKM matrix element it features a strange (anti-)quark and a gluon in its initial state. References [41,[48][49][50] have studied charm production in the context of strange PDF determination in NLO QCD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W + c production at the LHC is a powerful probe for the strange PDF [46] and its asymmetry [47] because at tree-level and for the dominant CKM matrix element it features a strange (anti-)quark and a gluon in its initial state. References [41,[48][49][50] have studied charm production in the context of strange PDF determination in NLO QCD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarises the low-mass and on-shell datasets, where in each case we indicate the experiment, the centre-of-mass energy √ s, the publication reference, the physical observable, and the number of data points. The only difference as compared to [95] is the removal of the W → eν asymmetry measurements from D0 [97], which were found to be inconsistent with the rest of the Drell-Yan data.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The present analysis is based on the DIS and DY measurements which were part of the strangeness study of [95], which in turn was a variant of the NNPDF3.1 global PDF determination [74], extended with additional high-mass DY cross sections. The DIS structure functions include the same legacy HERA inclusive combination [96] used in the DIS-only joint fit of PDF and EFT effects of [72].…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations