2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0764-4442(00)01718-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strong consistency for maximum likelihood estimates: a proof not based on the likelihood ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the latter claimed that the underlying assumptions are easy to check in practice, a few of them involve the calculation of upper bounds which are not obvious to obtain. Although Wald's proof of consistency has opened the way for more studies on the strong consistency of the MLE (see for example [3,5,7]), it remains a central result in Statistics. When the MLE is available in closed-form, the study of its strong consistency could certainly be done directly by using its closed-form expression and the properties of the underlying statistical distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the latter claimed that the underlying assumptions are easy to check in practice, a few of them involve the calculation of upper bounds which are not obvious to obtain. Although Wald's proof of consistency has opened the way for more studies on the strong consistency of the MLE (see for example [3,5,7]), it remains a central result in Statistics. When the MLE is available in closed-form, the study of its strong consistency could certainly be done directly by using its closed-form expression and the properties of the underlying statistical distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not make use of any Uniform Law of Large Numbers. Our method does not belong to the Glivenko-Cantelli approaches of consistency, as in [Dud98], [Fio00], [AK94], [vdV98] and [vdG03, vdG00] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%