2020
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.ac119.011747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structural features that distinguish PD-L2 from PD-L1 emerged in placental mammals

Abstract: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory receptor on T lymphocytes that is critical for modulating adaptive immunity. As such, it has been successfully exploited for cancer immunotherapy. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2 are ligands for PD-1; the former is ubiquitously expressed in inflamed tissues, whereas the latter is restricted to antigen-presenting cells. PD-L2 binds to PD-1 with 3-fold stronger affinity compared with PD-L1. To date, this affinity discrepancy has been attributed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
61
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, these results support the protein affinity to its designed targets, appearing as an interesting option in the inflammatory animal models addressed in the present study. Despite the reported similar KD values of the CD80 and HYBRI CTLA4 interaction, the KD values of the PD-1 and HYBRI’s PD-L2 interaction are higher than the values found in the literature [ 31 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Similarly to the increased affinity of the modified PD-L2 described by Philips et al [ 51 ], PD-L2 molecules in the HYBRI construct may have suffered conformational changes, which might account for its increased binding to PD-1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, these results support the protein affinity to its designed targets, appearing as an interesting option in the inflammatory animal models addressed in the present study. Despite the reported similar KD values of the CD80 and HYBRI CTLA4 interaction, the KD values of the PD-1 and HYBRI’s PD-L2 interaction are higher than the values found in the literature [ 31 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Similarly to the increased affinity of the modified PD-L2 described by Philips et al [ 51 ], PD-L2 molecules in the HYBRI construct may have suffered conformational changes, which might account for its increased binding to PD-1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Despite the reported similar KD values of the CD80 and HYBRI CTLA4 interaction, the KD values of the PD-1 and HYBRI's PD-L2 interaction are higher than the values found in the literature [31,[49][50][51][52]. Similarly to the increased affinity of the modified PD-L2 described by Philips et al [51], PD-L2 molecules in the HYBRI construct may have suffered conformational changes, which might account for its increased binding to PD-1. Nevertheless, in both rat models HYBRI shows therapeutic efficacy, which suggests that the binding is high enough to exert biological effects.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In contrast, PD-L2 expression is restricted mainly to antigenpresenting cells. PD-L2 has a much stronger affinity for PD-1 than does PD-L1 [12]. There is a difference in the expression of these two ligands in different tumor types, something which might have therapeutic implications [13].…”
Section: Immune Checkpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the SPR data depends on the several external factors such as buffer compositions [ 19 ], types of the sensor chip with different matrix on the gold surface [ 20 22 ], and coupling techniques of ligands on the sensor surface [ 23 , 24 ]. For slow dissociating analyte-ligand interactions, the chip surface has to be regenerated with proper regeneration solution without affecting the ligand activity [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%