2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Suitability of Web Analytics Key Performance Indicators in the Academic Library Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Brief descriptions of these types follow, but more in-depth analyses are available in other studies (Clifton, 2012;Fagan, 2014;Jansen, 2006;Nakatani & Chuang, 2011).…”
Section: Overview Of Web Analytics Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brief descriptions of these types follow, but more in-depth analyses are available in other studies (Clifton, 2012;Fagan, 2014;Jansen, 2006;Nakatani & Chuang, 2011).…”
Section: Overview Of Web Analytics Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este tipo de bibliotecas almacenan información sobre libros, artículos científicos en revistas y congresos, diarios oficiales, y usuarios registrados (Renda y Straccia, 2005;Smeaton y Callan, 2005;Calhoun, 2002). Los avances tecnológicos asociados con la denominada Web 2.0 (O'Reilly, 2005) han posibilitado la aparición de un gran número de nuevos paradigmas y servicios relacionados con las UDL, en los que el usuario es el actor principal y puede crear, modificar y publicar de forma sencilla nuevos contenidos web en colaboración con otros usuarios a través de nuevas aplicaciones y dispositivos como los blogs, wikis, chats, podcasts, gestores RSS (formato para compartir contenido en la web, abreviado del inglés: Really Simple Syndication), las redes sociales o los nuevos dispositivos móvi-les inteligentes (Fagan, 2014). Ello ha originado la aparición del término Bibliotecas 2.0 (Library 2.0) (Casey y Savastinuk, 2007).…”
Section: Estado Del Arteunclassified
“…Yang and Perrin write, "Measuring the performance of a library Web site, therefore, becomes a key factor in determining the relative success or failure of library service" (Yang and Perrin 2014, 405). Fagan (2014) (Loftus 2012, 47). Since most key performance indicators in Google Analytics are geared toward commerce, it's important to establish separate indicators to evaluate how users acquire information that meets their needs and tasks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research regarding key performance indicators in Google Analytics are not analyzed through the lens of user experience, nor is there research on how the use of Google Analytics impacts access to library resources. Instead, the primary articles on using key performance indicators in Google Analytics are oriented towards e-commerce sites to track transaction time and clicks to purchases to serve commercial entities (Fagan 2014). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%