1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SV40 large T oncoprotein disrupts DNA-binding of the cell cycle-regulated transcriptional repressor CDF

Abstract: A hallmark of neoplastic transformation by DNA tumor viruses is the deregulation of cell cycle genes. At least in some genes, this deregulation appears to be due to the oncoprotein-mediated disruption of complexes between E2F and pocket proteins and the ensuing generation of transcriptionally active free E2F. In the present study, we have analysed the e ect of the SV40 large T oncoprotein (SV-LT) on the function of a di erent cell cycle-regulated transcriptional repressor, CDF, which is the principal regulator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A link between p53 and CDF-1 is further supported by the recent observation that simian virus 40 large T antigen, which binds and inactivates p53, prevents CDF-1 from binding to CDE elements in WI-38 cells (63). Further components of this pathway and its role in DNA damage-induced G 2 /M arrest are unknown at present, but it is interesting to speculate on these (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A link between p53 and CDF-1 is further supported by the recent observation that simian virus 40 large T antigen, which binds and inactivates p53, prevents CDF-1 from binding to CDE elements in WI-38 cells (63). Further components of this pathway and its role in DNA damage-induced G 2 /M arrest are unknown at present, but it is interesting to speculate on these (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…1). This was surprising, since ORC1 is E2F‐regulated, and SV40 transformation is known to deregulate such genes [Nevins, 1992; Zwicker et al, 1999], whereas ORC2 and ORC4 are not E2F‐regulated [Ohtani et al, 1996; Springer et al, 1999]. On the other hand, HeLa cells harbor significantly more ORC1 than the SV40‐transformed primary cells, but the levels of ORC2 and ORC4 are similar between these lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that EMSAs do not necessarily reveal the actual changes occurring at this site. The same may hold true for the effects of the T antigens because it was shown by in vivo footprinting of another promoter carrying a CDE-CHR, that of the cdc25C gene, that proteins binding to the CDE-CHR are removed by SV40 T antigen (46). Since different promoters which all carry CDE-CHR motifs are activated at different times during the cell cycle and are therefore probably not regulated in exactly the same way, it would be interesting to see, using in vivo footprinting, whether Py T antigens can change protein binding to the CDE-CHR of the cyclin A promoter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%