1981
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.139.4.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Syndrome of Capgras

Abstract: Three new cases of the syndrome of Capgras are presented. An unusual variant of the syndrome is recorded. It is contended that the definition of the syndrome should be widened to include impersonators who exhibit slight differences from the prototype, and that ambivalence and projection cannot explain all cases. The syndrome is critically reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It consists of the conviction that human beings, more rarely inanimate objects, have been replaced by 'impostors with a close resemblance to the originals' [4,5]. The prevalence is estimated at approximately 0.027% in the general population and is observed with a similar frequency in male and female patients [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of the conviction that human beings, more rarely inanimate objects, have been replaced by 'impostors with a close resemblance to the originals' [4,5]. The prevalence is estimated at approximately 0.027% in the general population and is observed with a similar frequency in male and female patients [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients report the presence of physical similarities between the original and misidentified individuals, and a dynamic transformation occurring between the two. Finally, the Capgras delusion (CD) [13], a subtly different form of misidentification from FD and ID, is characterised by the delusional belief that a significant other has been replaced by an impostor who bears a close physical resemblance to the original [14]. Again, small misperceived differences, for instance in physical appearance and behaviour, are frequently used to distinguish the impostor from the loved one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes the impostors of the patient's familiar person are more than one, and are usually told apart by slight differences in appearance. We come across this odd feature in many cases, as for example in the case described by Young et al [22] : 'On her admission she claimed that her son had been replaced by two impostors, which over the next week became four', or by Todd et al [13] : 'Eleven days after the patient's admission, the patient expressed her conviction to Dr T's registrar that there were four Dr T's, and while their voice was the same, three of them were wearing a mask'; and again in the case of another patient [13] : 'She stated that men resembling and dressed like her husband had come to their home pretending to be him'. We can add many more to these examples, as well as one of our own patients [23] , who claimed that every day another 'son' came home, and she was able to distinguish between them by slight differences in their appearance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%