Proceedings of the 2011 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cscwd.2011.5960069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The TATIN-PIC project: A multi-modal collaborative work environment for preliminary design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each group, 2-3 students were responsible for the majority of ideas produced, with shared talk time being significantly lower when compared with all experimental modalities. This supports previous findings from Jones et al (2011). In groups scoring high on cooperation, ideas were produced and challenged with high frequency.…”
Section: Technology-free Sessionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In each group, 2-3 students were responsible for the majority of ideas produced, with shared talk time being significantly lower when compared with all experimental modalities. This supports previous findings from Jones et al (2011). In groups scoring high on cooperation, ideas were produced and challenged with high frequency.…”
Section: Technology-free Sessionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Contrariwise, working with a vertical display rendered the interactions more "socially awkward," often decoupling individuals working at the board from the rest of the group (Rogers & Lindley, 2004). Meanwhile, another study using both horizontal and vertical surfaces at the University of Technology of Compiegne found that the different surfaces facilitated different types of activity: tables were most useful for divergence and the generation of ideas, while vertical surfaces helped in decision making processes (Jones, Kendira, Lenne, Gidel, & Moulin, 2011). These studies have concluded that size and orientation of work surfaces impact behaviour in specific ways (especially socially), however the impact of work surfaces on collaborative processes merits further investigation.…”
Section: Tactile and Tabletop Technologies: Physical-digital Workpacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help designing the TATIN-PIC platform (Jones et al, 2011;Moulin et al, 2011), we defined an ontology hereafter referred as OntoTATIN-PIC. It is primarily aimed at helping the design team composed of multidisciplinary researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pour mieux comprendre l'engagement dans la collaboration et les compétences qui y sont associées, nous nous appuyons sur les résultats d'une expérimentation menée au sein de l'université de technologie de Compiègne (UTC), mobilisant des tables et tableaux multitouche et multiutilisateur. À l'origine le dispositif avait pour but de faciliter la collaboration entre ingénieurs lors des phases de conception, en les aidant par sa forme (alliant table et tableau) à retrouver des espaces collectifs de réflexion et un sens de présence sociale (Riva et al, 2012 ;Jones et al, 2011). Pour le qualifier, nous parlons d'un espace physique-numérique, pour le distinguer des espaces « virtuels » ou « à distance » d'une part, des dispositifs non numériques (tableau, paperboard, post-it…) d'autre part.…”
unclassified