“…1 B , C , Table 1 ). On the PTH1R‐R186H mutant, the maximum response to PTH( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ) was moderately higher than that observed on PTH1R‐WT (Emax = 118% ± 4%, p = 0.002, Table 1 ), whereas the potency of the response tended to be slightly (approximately threefold) weaker than that of the ligand on PTH1R‐WT. The reason for the increase in Emax is not clear, because the patient phenotype predicts a deficiency in responsiveness to PTH, which is at least suggested by the trend toward reduced potency.…”