2020
DOI: 10.1159/000509862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Top 100 Most-Cited Papers in Cariology: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract: A highly cited paper is seen as a landmark in any field and can influence both research and clinical practice. This study aimed to quali-quantitatively analyze the 100 most-cited papers in Cariology. A search strategy was first determined using specific keywords related to the field. A comprehensive search was then conducted in the Thompson Reuters Web of Science citation indexing database up to April 2019. Papers focused on any aspect of Cariology were included. A panel of 4 researchers conducted the selectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the limitations of the employed search engine might negatively impact the accuracy and representativeness of bibliometric analyses. There may be quantitative or qualitative differences between Elsevier Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science pertinent to citation counts for a publication depending on a study's field of discipline [158][159][160] as well as the journals [161] and years [162] in which they were published. Furthermore, these search engines [159,163] might not cover certain publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that the limitations of the employed search engine might negatively impact the accuracy and representativeness of bibliometric analyses. There may be quantitative or qualitative differences between Elsevier Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science pertinent to citation counts for a publication depending on a study's field of discipline [158][159][160] as well as the journals [161] and years [162] in which they were published. Furthermore, these search engines [159,163] might not cover certain publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be quantitative or qualitative differences between Elsevier Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science pertinent to citation counts for a publication depending on a study's field of discipline [158][159][160] as well as the journals [161] and years [162] in which they were published. Furthermore, these search engines [159,163] might not cover certain publications. Some imbalance in the representativeness of our research may have appeared due to the limitation involved in only researching Elsevier's Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pleasingly, two key papers from the ICDAS Group in 2007 11,12 were included in the top six of the top 100 most cited papers in cariology. 13 In general comparisons across all time, the Lancet paper 'Dental caries' by Selwitz, Ismail and Pitts 11 was ranked fourth while a Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology paper on the ICDAS 12 by Ismail, Sohn, Tellez, Amaya, Sen, Hasson and Pitts was ranked sixth. When citations were considered by five-year period, by year, or by six-month period, the Lancet paper 11 took first position in each case as the most cited paper.…”
Section: The Initial Development Of 'Icdas'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When citations were considered by five-year period, by year, or by six-month period, the Lancet paper 11 took first position in each case as the most cited paper. 13…”
Section: The Initial Development Of 'Icdas'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibliometric analysis uses mathematical and statistical methods to quantitatively and quantitatively analyse publications in medical databases, revealing the development history, research focus and future trends of a certain field. In addition, bibliometric analysis can implement comparisons between different countries or institutions by analysing the quality and quantity of previous research ( Baldiotti et al, 2020 ; Yan et al, 2020 ). As much progress has been made concerning the potential of stem cells in cartilage regeneration, the number of related papers has also increased drastically, but related bibliometric studies have not been performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%