2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00506-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The triple stimulation technique to study central motor conduction to the lower limbs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TST eliminates inXuences of MN discharge desynchronization and of repMNDs on the response size (discussed in detail by Bühler et al 2001;Magistris et al 1998;Rösler et al 2002). It is thus well suited to quantify the Wrst MN discharges evoked by the brain stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TST eliminates inXuences of MN discharge desynchronization and of repMNDs on the response size (discussed in detail by Bühler et al 2001;Magistris et al 1998;Rösler et al 2002). It is thus well suited to quantify the Wrst MN discharges evoked by the brain stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axonal loss may result in increased motor thresholds, small MEP size (amplitude and area) [14,35] and, in severe cases, in prolonged CMCT. Even so, there are several publications on CMCT alterations in the literature [17,23,27,28,29,41,42], but very few investigated amplitude and area alterations, especially in patients with low disability [8,13,30,38,37,42].The aim of the present study was to evaluate MEP amplitude alterations compared with CMCT in MS patients with low disability (EDSS 0-3.5) and to assess if the abnormalities increased in the group with higher EDSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…28,29 It is difficult to deduce the precise fraction of the knee extensor motor pool activated by TMS because of complications associated with comparisons of MEP and Mmax amplitudes due to phase cancellation of motor unit action potentials at the muscle membrane. 2,12 For example, MEP amplitude and, to a lesser extent, area can be considerably smaller than Mmax, even if TMS activates all of the motoneurons in a motor pool. 2,12 Nevertheless, the TMS stimuli activated a sufficiently large proportion of the knee extensor motor pool to evoke extra force even at MVC, and they yielded ERTs of comparable magnitude to the RT elicited by supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,12 For example, MEP amplitude and, to a lesser extent, area can be considerably smaller than Mmax, even if TMS activates all of the motoneurons in a motor pool. 2,12 Nevertheless, the TMS stimuli activated a sufficiently large proportion of the knee extensor motor pool to evoke extra force even at MVC, and they yielded ERTs of comparable magnitude to the RT elicited by supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation. Thus, the data demonstrate that a large proportion of the knee extensor motoneuron pool was activated by TMS, as is required for accurate measurement of VA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%