2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trust Game for Couples (TGC): A new standardized paradigm to assess trust in romantic relationships

Abstract: Trust between couples is a prerequisite for stable and satisfactory romantic relationships. However, there has been no valid research tool to assess partner-specific trust behavior including costly investments in the trustworthiness of the romantic partner. We here present a comprehensive validation of the newly developed Trust Game for Couples (TGC) by means of various self-report and implicit relationship-related measures. The TGC operationalizes trust by measuring an individual's willingness to invest his o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IOS scale correlates with both feeling close and behaving close ( Aron et al, 1992 ), which could explain why farmers who had higher psychological proximity to their veterinarian were more likely to do more to prevent and control BVD if they had an open herd, behaviors that tend to align with veterinary advice. Trust is part of the interpretation that respondents give to the IOS scale and the two are correlated ( Kong, 2018 ; Kleinert et al, 2020 ). Therefore, farmers who felt closer to their veterinarian also had greater trust in veterinarians (correlation coefficient = 0.52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IOS scale correlates with both feeling close and behaving close ( Aron et al, 1992 ), which could explain why farmers who had higher psychological proximity to their veterinarian were more likely to do more to prevent and control BVD if they had an open herd, behaviors that tend to align with veterinary advice. Trust is part of the interpretation that respondents give to the IOS scale and the two are correlated ( Kong, 2018 ; Kleinert et al, 2020 ). Therefore, farmers who felt closer to their veterinarian also had greater trust in veterinarians (correlation coefficient = 0.52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As occurs with satisfaction, trust has significant relevance to explain long-term romantic relationships (Campbell & Staton, 2018;Simpson, 2007). In fact, trust positively impacts the quality of relationships influencing several aspects such as love, confidence, commitment, and general happiness (Campbell et al, 2010;Kleinert, et al 2020;Kosfeld, et al 2005;Rempel, et al 1985;Wieselquist, et al 1999). Although trust is a relevant predictor of a long-term romantic relationship, only one study investigated the potential effect of similarity in attractiveness in couples over trust (Conroy-Beam et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trusting a stranger is a prerequisite for initiating any kinds of social relationships, especially those with potential mating partners [1][2][3] . Besides its obvious benefits for our personal well-being 4 , this particularly intimate sort of human social bond involves significant risks and interpersonal dependency, as the partner might choose to disappoint expectations or abuse one's own investments in the relationship (e.g., emotions, time, resources 5,6 ). To minimize such risks, it is necessary that we accurately and quickly infer another's trustworthiness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%