1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00162795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tsunami threat on the Mexican west coast: A historical analysis and recommendations for hazard mitigation

Abstract: From an inspection of all tide gauge records for the western coast of Mexico over the last 37 years, a data base of all recorded tsunamis was made. Information on relevant historical events dating back two centuries, using newspaper archives, previous catalogs, and local witness interviews, was added to produce a catalog of tsunamis for the western coast of Mexico. A description of the 1932 Cuyutlfin tsunami is given. This is considered to be the most destructive local tsunami which has ever occurred in the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly (though occurring prior to the portion of the catalog analyzed in this study), a M w = 7.9 mainshock on June 3, 1932 in central Mexico produced two tsunamigenic aftershocks (M w = 7.8, M s = 6.9) within 20 days. The second aftershock generated a much larger local tsunami (most likely from a concomitant landslide) than either the mainshock or the first tsunamigenic aftershock [Farreras and Sanchez, 1991]. Therefore, there is a significant amount of complexity among triggered earthquakes in terms of the causative mechanism and the size of the tsunamis they generate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly (though occurring prior to the portion of the catalog analyzed in this study), a M w = 7.9 mainshock on June 3, 1932 in central Mexico produced two tsunamigenic aftershocks (M w = 7.8, M s = 6.9) within 20 days. The second aftershock generated a much larger local tsunami (most likely from a concomitant landslide) than either the mainshock or the first tsunamigenic aftershock [Farreras and Sanchez, 1991]. Therefore, there is a significant amount of complexity among triggered earthquakes in terms of the causative mechanism and the size of the tsunamis they generate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earthquake is known as the Chiapas earthquake or the Pijijiapan earthquake of 2017, and it was felt from the Oaxaca and Chiapas regions in the south to the center of Mexico in the capital. This event is the most powerful earthquake in Mexico since the 1985 Michoacan earthquake in Mexico City (Mendoza 1993) and the 1932 Jalisco earthquake (Farreras and Sanchez 1991;Ramírez-Herrera et al 2014). Along the Pacific coast of Mexico, there are two distinctly defined seismic gaps: the Tehuantepec and Guerrero gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the Hotel Madrid, located on the top of a sand dune 10 m a.m.s.l., inundation depth reached 2 m, and 2 to 3 m toward the sand dunes, 450 m inland on the main street in Cuyutlan (Farreras and Sánchez, 1991). While further inland, 720 m at the train station, inundation depth reached 1.5 m (Gaspar, 2010).…”
Section: Inundation Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camfield, 1994;Nott, 1997;Titov and Synolakis, 1997;EERI, 2011) The area drained in about three hours. Drainage went in two directions, one heading southeast through the beach, and the other to the sea through the estuary, southeast from Boca de Apiza (Farreras and Sánchez, 1991). This drainage most probably went through the Armería River, located 11 km southeast of Cuyutlán, because the estuary and Cuyutlán lagoon are connected by the Armería River.…”
Section: Inundation Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%