2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2009.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The two-stage recombination operator and its application to the multiobjective 0/1 knapsack problem: A comparative study

Abstract: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) Crossover operators Multiobjective combinatorial optimization (MOCO) Multiobjective 0/1 knapsack problem (MOKP)In this paper, we first propose a new recombination operator called the two-stage recombination and then we test its performance in the context of the multiobjective 0/1 knapsack problem (MOKP). The proposed recombination operator generates only one offspring solution from a selected pair of parents according to the following two stages. In the first stag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using smoothed analysis (the specified inputs of the model are subjected to a random perturbation) Beier et al (2007) proposed a tight bound on the expected number of efficient solutions for general bi-objective integer optimization problems, which is a very interesting information within a resolution procedure. More recent research works on the {0,1}-knapsack problem considering more than two objective functions are available: Aghezzaf andNaimi (2009), Bazgan et al (2009a,b). The work by Bazgan et al (2009b) is an exact approach based on dynamic programming using several complementary dominance relations in order to discard no promising partial solutions.…”
Section: The Bi-objective {01}-knapsack Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using smoothed analysis (the specified inputs of the model are subjected to a random perturbation) Beier et al (2007) proposed a tight bound on the expected number of efficient solutions for general bi-objective integer optimization problems, which is a very interesting information within a resolution procedure. More recent research works on the {0,1}-knapsack problem considering more than two objective functions are available: Aghezzaf andNaimi (2009), Bazgan et al (2009a,b). The work by Bazgan et al (2009b) is an exact approach based on dynamic programming using several complementary dominance relations in order to discard no promising partial solutions.…”
Section: The Bi-objective {01}-knapsack Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bazgan et al (2009a) proposed a fully polynomial approximation scheme also based in the same ideas to solve an approximation of the problem. Aghezzaf and Naimi (2009) propose a new recombination operator, which is a two-stage process preserving in the first stage the similar characteristics of the solutions to be combined and accepting the non-similar parts considering a fitness function. This approach is to be used in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in order to enhance its performance.…”
Section: The Bi-objective {01}-knapsack Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies investigated performance improvement strategies for binary genetic algorithms, which are popular and can be applied in a straightforward way to solve MOKPs. Aghezzaf and Naimi (2009) improved the recombination procedure by introducing a two-stage crossover. In the first stage, the offspring is initialized in the way the similar genes of parents are inherited.…”
Section: Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that their hybrid GA can reach high-quality solutions in a little computing time. On the other hand, Aghezzaf and Naimi (2009) propose a two-stage recombination operator especially dedicated for the multi-objective variant of 0/1 MKP, in which only one offspring is generated through two stages: The similarity-preserving stage and the problem-specific knowledge stage. Their crossover operator was tested using two well-known patterns of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is a sexual selection that improves the one proposed by Varnamkhasti and Lee (2012). The second operator is an adaptation through two new variants dedicated to 0/1 MKP, of the two-stage recombination operator proposed by Aghezzaf and Naimi (2009). The motivation behind the improvement as well as the combination of these two operators is firstly their effectiveness to solve some variants of 0/1 MKP when compared with other classical selection and crossover operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%