2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06199-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ultimate guide to the anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies galaxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slight pattern of increase in the mean monthly dosage units of triptans dispensed per patient was observed between the 12th and 15th month from therapy initiation, likely due to the mandatory interruption of anti‐CGRP therapy after 12 months of treatment according to national reimbursement criteria. These findings seem to confirm the efficacy of these medications reported from clinical trials and real‐world studies 48 . Concerning evidence from observational studies, Tepper and colleagues 49 reported that the mean number of triptan claims observed 6 months after treatment initiation was halved compared to baseline (i.e., from 2.41 to 0.87 claims per month).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A slight pattern of increase in the mean monthly dosage units of triptans dispensed per patient was observed between the 12th and 15th month from therapy initiation, likely due to the mandatory interruption of anti‐CGRP therapy after 12 months of treatment according to national reimbursement criteria. These findings seem to confirm the efficacy of these medications reported from clinical trials and real‐world studies 48 . Concerning evidence from observational studies, Tepper and colleagues 49 reported that the mean number of triptan claims observed 6 months after treatment initiation was halved compared to baseline (i.e., from 2.41 to 0.87 claims per month).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway are among the most useful therapeutic tools for migraine prevention due to a favorable efficacy/tolerability profile coupled to a considerable speed of action [1]. Prospective, multicenter, real-world evidence (RWE) studies hinted that their effectiveness is higher than efficacy, suggesting that unilateral pain (alone or associated with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms or allodynia) may represent a positive response predictor [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 30 years ago, increased CGRP levels in blood samples taken from the jugular vein in migraine attacks were reported that supported the presumption that CGRP may have a crucial role in migraine [21]. Therefore, some agents that block CGRP and its receptors that may potentially reduce migraine attacks have been investigated [5][6][7]. Over time, clinical trials have been conducted with various agents, and CGRP blockade in migraine patients has been found to be statistically more beneficial than placebo in phase 3 studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent studies have indicated that blocking CGRP can be used in migraine treatment [2][3][4]. Phase 3 studies involving migraine patients revealed that CGRP blockade was significantly more beneficial than placebo [5][6][7]. Yet, systematic reviews in the following years have reported that CGRP blockade may not have a more substantial effect than the current prophylactic treatment options in preventing migraine attacks [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%