2023
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00540-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unfolded protein response components IRE1α and XBP1 promote human coronavirus infection

Abstract: The cellular processes that support human coronavirus replication and contribute to the pathogenesis of severe disease remain incompletely understood. Many viruses, including coronaviruses, cause endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress during infection. IRE1α is a component of the cellular response to ER stress that initiates non-conventional splicing of XBP1 mRNA. Spliced XBP1 encodes a transcription factor that induces the expression of ER-related targets. Activation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the IRE1/XBP1s pathway has not been shown to upregulate GADD34, we tested whether IRE1 inhibition would perturb GADD34 expression in OC43-infected cells. As reported previously in another model [33], OC43 infection induced XBP1s in 293A cells (Figure 3E). The addition of specific IRE1 inhibitor 4µ8C inhibited XBP1s' induction triggered by OC43 infection or Tg treatment in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3E,F), but did not affect GADD34 induction.…”
Section: The Activation Of the Integrated Stress Response Pathway Is ...supporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the IRE1/XBP1s pathway has not been shown to upregulate GADD34, we tested whether IRE1 inhibition would perturb GADD34 expression in OC43-infected cells. As reported previously in another model [33], OC43 infection induced XBP1s in 293A cells (Figure 3E). The addition of specific IRE1 inhibitor 4µ8C inhibited XBP1s' induction triggered by OC43 infection or Tg treatment in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3E,F), but did not affect GADD34 induction.…”
Section: The Activation Of the Integrated Stress Response Pathway Is ...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This suggests that OC43 is efficient at avoiding the detection of its dsRNA molecules by PKR by shielding them inside the double membrane replication transcription compartments and/or by the action of the Nsp15 protein [ 45 ], and does not actively block PKR activation. By contrast, OC43 infection caused a detectable activation of PERK, consistent with its ability to trigger ER stress in infected cells [ 33 , 46 , 47 ]. Interestingly, PERK activation was previously shown to either inhibit (transmissible gastroenteritis virus, [ 28 ]) or promote (porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, [ 44 ]) coronavirus replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the IRE1 overexpression in the Vero-infected cells induced the upregulation of cleaved caspase-9 as well as nFκB activation and TNF-a expression, which were ameliorated when the cells were treated with the antiviral agent Nelfinavir [97]. Although the findings from Oda et al in HCT-9, Calu-3, and Vero-3 indicated the activation of the UPR and IRE1a pathway, they contradict previous reports as they found in samples from patients with severe COVID-19 the overexpression of both activated IRE1a and XBP1s, thus indicating the RNase activity of IRE1 [98]. Nevertheless, all the reports indicate the significance of the IRE1a branch in SARS-CoV-2 infection.…”
Section: Betacoronaviruses: the Case Of Sars-cov-2mentioning
confidence: 75%