2000
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200011010-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Gene Therapy in Craniofacial Bone Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, limitations exist with these reconstructive approaches including lack of predictability and ability to achieve volumetric bone changes beyond the benvelopeQ of the alveolus. Advances in the field of tissue engineering and biomimetics offer significant potential to regenerate craniofacial structures using biologic mediators and matrices that mimic the tissueTs original formative processes [13,14]. In this study, in vivo gene therapy was used to deliver BMP-7 to promote osteogenesis and osseointegration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limitations exist with these reconstructive approaches including lack of predictability and ability to achieve volumetric bone changes beyond the benvelopeQ of the alveolus. Advances in the field of tissue engineering and biomimetics offer significant potential to regenerate craniofacial structures using biologic mediators and matrices that mimic the tissueTs original formative processes [13,14]. In this study, in vivo gene therapy was used to deliver BMP-7 to promote osteogenesis and osseointegration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many viral carriers showed an attenuated response (32) or are ineffective in animals with intact immune systems. (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) Immunosuppression of normal animals can restore the efficacy of viral therapy, (42) (Table 1), which recognizes the preference of practitioners in the field. Nonviral methods, including use of naked pDNA and physical delivery methods (Fig.…”
Section: Pdna Delivery For Bone Induction and Functional Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone induction via endochondral ossification was observed in hindlimb muscle of immunocompetent rats (101,102) Viral particles delivered on hydroxyapatite scaffold to the back muscles of immunocompetent rats led to bone formation (103) Bone formation in thigh muscle after delivery of a tetracycline-sensitive expression system was observed in mice only when a tetracycline analogue was administered (153) Orthotopic AV Increased regeneration in a mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in rats (154) Increased bone regeneration in an osteoporotic fracture model in tibia of sheep (155) Bone formation or increased regeneration was observed in several defect models, including a critical-size mandibular defect, (33) critical-size nasal defect in athymic nude mice, (156) rib defect in horses, (157) metatarsal defect in horses, (158) and femoral critical-size defect in rats (159) Injected AVs led to partial regeneration of critical-size calvarial defects in rats, with a more vigorous response when particles were delivered in a gelatin scaffold (117) Healing of iliac crest critical-size defects in sheep was delayed compared with no treatment when viral particles were injected to injury site (160) Bone formation was observed in a dental model in immunocompetent dogs (107) Enhanced cartilage and subchondral bone was observed in femur condyle defect in immunocompetent ponies (161) Delaying administration of viral particles improved healing of femur critical-size defects in rats (162) …”
Section: Aavmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations