2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of cervical sonography to differentiate true from false labor in term patients presenting for labor check

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An experimental follow‐up of term pregnant women by ultrasonography revealed a good overall correlation between cervical length and its ability to differentiate true from false labor. ‘Overall, a cervical length cutoff of ≤1.5 cm to predict true labor had the highest specificity (81%) and positive predictive value (83%)’ . Other researchers also advocate this hypothesis: ‘a woman with similar dilation, who has advanced effacement, is nearly 2.5 times more likely to deliver within 7 days, and twice as likely to deliver within 14 days’ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An experimental follow‐up of term pregnant women by ultrasonography revealed a good overall correlation between cervical length and its ability to differentiate true from false labor. ‘Overall, a cervical length cutoff of ≤1.5 cm to predict true labor had the highest specificity (81%) and positive predictive value (83%)’ . Other researchers also advocate this hypothesis: ‘a woman with similar dilation, who has advanced effacement, is nearly 2.5 times more likely to deliver within 7 days, and twice as likely to deliver within 14 days’ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Overall, a cervical length cutoff of ≤1.5 cm to predict true labor had the highest specificity (81%) and positive predictive value (83%)'. 25 Other researchers also advocate this hypothesis: 'a woman with similar dilation, who has advanced effacement, is nearly 2.5 times more likely to deliver within 7 days, and twice as likely to deliver within 14 days'. 15 In other words, follow-up of women with similar cervical dilatation, showed that those with greater progression of effacement delivered 2.5 times sooner than the others over seven day management, while more prolonged follow-up at 14 days showed the mentioned group delivered two times more, as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Kunzier et al reported a 58.4% prevalence of true labor in patients via CL measurements. 28 Furthermore, Bouzid et al reported a significantly better result in the differentiation of true and false term labor cases with CL measurements and combined UCA measurements with UCAs >123 . 14 We found a 7.5 LR (+) for women with a UCA ≥105 and delivery within 7 days.…”
Section: Interpretation and Comparison With Other Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential application for TVUS at the time of term labor lies in distinguishing true labor from false labor in patients presenting with labor symptoms. In one study of term nulliparous and multiparous patients, a CL cutoff of 1.5 cm provided the highest specificity (81%), positive predictive value (83%), and positive likelihood ratios (4.2) for distinguishing true from false labor [54]. Although promising, the results of the findings have yet to be confirmed by other studies, and there is insufficient evidence to support its use and clinical utility.…”
Section: Us Cervix Transperinealmentioning
confidence: 99%