1937
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
1,076
0
35

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,041 publications
(1,117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
1,076
0
35
Order By: Relevance
“…Friedman test for relative efficiency analysis and ranks were allotted by assigning the 296 higher value to the better yield method (Friedman et al, 1937). A P-value of <0.05 297 was considered significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friedman test for relative efficiency analysis and ranks were allotted by assigning the 296 higher value to the better yield method (Friedman et al, 1937). A P-value of <0.05 297 was considered significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, food consumption showed no consistent differences between the groups, with some groups having occasionally slightly higher or lower consumptions than corresponding controls. However, when the data were analysed on a cumulative basis between 4, 13, 41 and 92 weeks (Friedman, 1937) both the saccharintreated groups (B and D) and the highdose OTS group (E) showed reduced consumption (Table IV).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparability of image processing between the different sessions of treatment was evaluated using the Freidman two-way ANOVA non-parametric test (13). A comparison between the mean value of the above variables before and after treatment was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed non-parametric test (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%