2000
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2000.9695040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of skin delayed‐type hypersensitivity as an adjunct test to diagnose brucellosis in cattle: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1997; Saegerman et al. 1999; Bercovich 2000). However, the advantages gained in specificity are reduced following vaccination, and the necessity for two farm visits, delay between repeat tests, and subjective nature of result interpretation, make this type of assay impractical for high throughput diagnosis.…”
Section: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1997; Saegerman et al. 1999; Bercovich 2000). However, the advantages gained in specificity are reduced following vaccination, and the necessity for two farm visits, delay between repeat tests, and subjective nature of result interpretation, make this type of assay impractical for high throughput diagnosis.…”
Section: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacteria of the genus Brucella (Bercovich, 2000). Brucellosis rarely results in human death, but it can pose a significant economic loss to owners of domesticated animals due to loss of progeny, reduced milk yield, and infertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…abortions, though B. melitensis and B. suis might also be responsible for infection [3][4][5][6][7] . The spread of the infection is mostly via aborted fetus, fetal membranes, lochia, urine, non-pasteurized milk and milk products 8 . Brucella spp.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%