The utility of point-of-care ultrasound in the assessment of volume status in acute and critically ill patients

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Volume resuscitation has only been demonstrated to be effective in approximately fifty percent of patients. The remaining patients do not respond to volume resuscitation and may even develop adverse outcomes (such as acute pulmonary edema necessitating endotracheal intubation). We believe that point-of-care ultrasound is an excellent modality by which to adequately predict which patients may benefi t from volume resuscitation. DATA RESOURCES: We performed a search using PubMed, Scopus, and MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: fluid responsiveness, ultrasound, non-invasive, hemodynamic, fluid challenge, and passive leg raise. Preference was given to clinical trials and review articles that were most relevant to the topic of assessing a patient's cardiovascular ability to respond to intravenous fl uid administration using ultrasound. RESULTS: Point-of-care ultrasound can be easily employed to measure the diameter and collapsibility of various large vessels including the inferior vena cava, common carotid artery, subclavian vein, internal jugular vein, and femoral vein. Such parameters are closely related to dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness and can be used by providers to help guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound in combination with passive leg raise is a non-invasive, costand time-effective modality that can be employed to assess volume status and response to fluid resuscitation. Traditionally sonographic studies have focused on the evaluation of large veins such as the inferior vena cava, and internal jugular vein. A number of recently published studies also demonstrate the usefulness of evaluating large arteries to predict volume status.

Effectiveness of an educational program on improving healthcare providers’ knowledge of acute stroke: A randomized block design study

“…The timely treatment of stroke enhances the opportunity of achieving excellent outcomes. [10] However, one of the most important factors that affect initiating appropriate treatment action by HCPs is to make an accurate diagnosis and a timely treatment plan. [11] Paramedics and emergency department (ED) personnel must be trained to accurately identify patients who are exhibiting symptoms of stroke using quick and standardized tests.…”

Retrospective analysis of eFAST ultrasounds performed on trauma activations at an academic level-1 trauma center

“…Totally 1,056 (66%) were men and 541 (34%) were women. Of these patients, 90 did not have indications for eFAST scan based on their mechanism of injury (drowning patients [11], patients with severe burns [75], and hangings [4]), while 1,507 patients were deemed to have indication for eFAST scan. A total of 1,111 (73%) of these patients had a documented and billed eFAST.…”

“…[2] POCUS can be applied across all organ systems, and it can be used to guide clinical decision-making and care of critically ill patients. [3,4] A prime example is the focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) scan, which detects free fl uid in the cardiac, thoracic, and abdominal cavities after trauma, particularly blunt trauma. It has been shown to be highly specifi c for detecting occult sources of hemorrhage, enabling expedited diagnosis and timely surgical intervention.…”

Are Gadgets Saviours in Salvaging Sick Cases – Ultrasound for Both Nerve Blocks and Vascular Access in a Case of Septic Shock

“…Ours was a case of forefoot amputation. When there is a drop in blood pressure in cases of sepsis the decision in fluid challenges will be intriguing [4]. Hence, we did a scan of the inferior vena cava to judge the status.…”