2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00612-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The V1–V3 transition index as a novel electrocardiographic criterion for differentiating left from right ventricular outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used DeLong's test (DeLong et al, 1988) to demonstrate that the automated ECG feature extraction method had a significantly higher AUC compared with that attained by the conventional QRS morphological feature extraction approach with a P-value = 0.035. The comparison of our approach against methods from 12 prior studies (Kamakura et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2009;Betensky et al, 2011;Yoshida et al, 2011Yoshida et al, , 2014Cheng et al, 2013Cheng et al, , 2018Nakano et al, 2014;Efimova et al, 2015;He et al, 2018;Xie et al, 2018;Di et al, 2019) shows that our algorithm achieved the highest performance scores (shown in Table 3). Additionally, we evaluated the general classification capability of each criterion proposed by previous studies using the database in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We used DeLong's test (DeLong et al, 1988) to demonstrate that the automated ECG feature extraction method had a significantly higher AUC compared with that attained by the conventional QRS morphological feature extraction approach with a P-value = 0.035. The comparison of our approach against methods from 12 prior studies (Kamakura et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2009;Betensky et al, 2011;Yoshida et al, 2011Yoshida et al, , 2014Cheng et al, 2013Cheng et al, , 2018Nakano et al, 2014;Efimova et al, 2015;He et al, 2018;Xie et al, 2018;Di et al, 2019) shows that our algorithm achieved the highest performance scores (shown in Table 3). Additionally, we evaluated the general classification capability of each criterion proposed by previous studies using the database in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The classification confusion matrix for these three methods shows correct and incorrect frequency counts in Supplementary Section A and Table 3. Furthermore, we compared our approach against related methods from 12 prior studies (Kamakura et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2009;Betensky et al, 2011;Yoshida et al, 2011Yoshida et al, , 2014Cheng et al, 2013Cheng et al, , 2018Nakano et al, 2014;Efimova et al, 2015;He et al, 2018;Xie et al, 2018;Di et al, 2019). ACC, F 1 -score, SE, SP, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were used to compare performances and are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is very difficult to separate the coronary cusp focus from RVOT PVC, because they are so close to each other 8 . The QRS morphology of outflow PVC can be affected by several factors such as lead position, cardiac anatomy, cardiac rotation, ventricular hypertrophy, breast size, body physique, gender, chest wall deformities, and conduction across the ventricular outflow tract septum 9 . Differentiation between left vs right site of origin especially in cases with early activation site (EAS) located in the septal RVOT, in which the sensitivity and specificity of ECG criteria, has been shown to be lower than described 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%