2014
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.140547
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of recommendations from clinical guidelines: a survival analysis

Abstract: Background: Clinical guidelines should be updated to maintain their validity. Our aim was to estimate the length of time before recommendations become outdated. Methods:We used a retrospective cohort design and included recommendations from clinical guidelines developed in the Spanish National Health System clinical guideline program since 2008. We performed a descriptive analysis of references, recommendations and resources used, and a survival analysis of re commendations using the Kaplan-Meier method. Resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
80
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is important, as it is aimed at improving implementability, by ensuring the recommendations are comprehensive, adaptable and applicable to the target group and have an open process [53]. Given the constant changing nature of evidence, having up-to-date guidelines certainly makes a difference to the validity [32]. However, the lowest rated item was for the guideline update procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process is important, as it is aimed at improving implementability, by ensuring the recommendations are comprehensive, adaptable and applicable to the target group and have an open process [53]. Given the constant changing nature of evidence, having up-to-date guidelines certainly makes a difference to the validity [32]. However, the lowest rated item was for the guideline update procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This search was limited from 2009 to search date, such that we would only capture CPGs developed within the past 5 years; given the evidence that CPGs may become out of date after only 3 years [32]. All languages were included in this search.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent analysis of the recommendations found in the Spanish National Health System CPGs developed since 2008 revealed that >20% of recommendations made in these CPGs became outdated within 3 years, and that number increases to 22.2% within 4 years. 27 Based on these findings, it is recommended that CPGs be updated at least every 3 years. 27 By these criteria, 71.43% of existing CPGs for persons with epilepsy can be considered at risk of being outdated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Based on these findings, it is recommended that CPGs be updated at least every 3 years. 27 By these criteria, 71.43% of existing CPGs for persons with epilepsy can be considered at risk of being outdated. This also depends, however, on the specific field and topic addressed by a guideline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 Updates may be provided sooner to include important new developments, such as evidence on benefits and harms of existing interventions, development of new treatments or changes in available treatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%