2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of microscopic semen motility assessment at collection for a commercial artificial insemination center, a retrospective study on factors explaining variation in pig fertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But there are certain variations in pig fertility explained by the boar and semen parameters. Many researchers have studied the relationship between semen parameters and fertility, with conflicting results (Tardif et al, 1999;Sellés et al, 2003;Popwell and Flowers, 2004;Ruiz-Sánchez et al, 2006;Broekhuijse et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there are certain variations in pig fertility explained by the boar and semen parameters. Many researchers have studied the relationship between semen parameters and fertility, with conflicting results (Tardif et al, 1999;Sellés et al, 2003;Popwell and Flowers, 2004;Ruiz-Sánchez et al, 2006;Broekhuijse et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average litter size produced when using frozen-thawed spermatozoa is below what most of the industry will accept (Ruiz-S anchez et al, 2006). Traditional analyses of boar spermatozoa that include motility, morphology and viability, are only moderately useful for identifying boars of low fertility (Flowers, 1997;Gadea et al, 2004;Gadea, 2005;Alm et al, 2006;Lovercamp et al, 2007;Broekhuijse et al, 2012). Knowledge of the causes of reduced fertility due to cryopreservation is incomplete, although there are reductions in routinely measured sperm traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are likely additional types of cellular damage due to cryopreservation that are not detected in standard semen analysis, given the low correlation between fertility and traditional microscopic evaluation. Numerous attempts have been made to identify in vitro sperm parameters that that are directly related to fertility (Holt et al, 1997;Tardif et al, 1999;Larsson & Rodrıǵuez-Martıńez, 2000;Waberski et al, 2005;Alm et al, 2006;Broekhuijse et al, 2012;Schulze et al, 2013). However, novel assays that measure sperm interactions within the female reproductive tract and with oocytes may be more predictive of in vivo function as well as useful when identifying reasons for reduced fertility (Fazeli et al, 1997;Braundmeier et al, 2004;Collins et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, boar-and semen-related parameters have been shown to explain only 4% of the variation in farrowing rates (Broekhuijse et al, 2012). Thus, other methods are needed to detect suboptimal in vivo fertilising ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%