The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale

Day, Doris; Littler, Curt M.; Swift, Richard W.; Gottlieb, Scott

doi:10.2165/00128071-200405010-00007

Cited by 232 publications

(174 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

164

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These results compare favorably with the 5-point WSRS, which used photographic references and descriptions. 9 In the study using the WSRS, the weighted kappa coefficients for the left (0.77) and right (0.81) sides of the face for intraobserver agreement were similar to those seen in this study.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: A Clinical Validated Measurement Tool for Nasolabial Wrinkle Severity Assessment

Shoshani¹,

Markovitz²,

Monstrey

et al. 2008

Dermatol Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: A Clinical Validated Measurement Tool for Nasolabial Wrinkle Severity Assessment

Shoshani¹,

Markovitz²,

Monstrey

et al. 2008

Dermatol Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The study included 40 volunteers (women) between 30 and 60 years old, with signs of volume loss in malar region, between 2 and 3, according to Raspaldo [3] clinical classification and nasolabial fold accentuation, with score between 2 and 3, according to clinical classification by Day and collaborators [9]. None of the patients had gone under temporary dermal filler procedures for 1 year or permanent dermal filler at any moment.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Injectable Polyethylene Glycol Gel as Dermal Filler: 01 Year Clinical and Ultrasound Follow-Up

Addor¹,

Neri²

2016

J Clin Exp Dermatol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Facial alterations that occur with aging are result of combined effects of soft tissue atrophy with loss of facial volume, gravitational factor and decrease of elastic tissue. In order to minimize these alterations, minimally invasive procedures such as cutaneous filling have been gaining space in clinical practice. In 2008, Scientech CorporationItalia introduced hydrogel of polyethylene glycol (PEG) REMAKE ® as cutaneous filler. This prospective study was developed to prove the effectiveness, safety and durability over the 12 months after the application of PEG hydrogel, commercialized under the name of REMAKE ® . 40 female volunteers were included, between 30 and 60 years, with signs of malar region volume loss between 2 and 3 (Raspaldo's classification) and Nasogenian furrow accentuation, with score between 2 and 3 (Day and collaborators' classification). No patient had carried out procedures of temporary filling for 1 year or permanent filling at any time. Objective parameters always show the scale of the improvement and an evaluation was selected through ultrasound exams and surface scan for evaluation of size and depth of wrinkles improvement. Evaluations by the US were carried out for 30, 120 and 360 days of product use, in a pilot group of 18 patients randomly selected to measure the product in the application plan and numerically assess alterations of volume (absorption/migration). Its durability of up to 01 year after application is proved when no significant reduction.

show abstract

“…Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), validated by Day et al [13], is a five grade scale where "5" is "very much improved" (75% -100% improvement), "4" is "much improved" (50% -75% improvement), "3" is "improved" (25% -50% improvement) 2 is minimal-no change (0% -25% improvement) and "1" is "worse". Patients' photographs were graded according to the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) by a board certified dermatologist in addition to subjective satisfaction questionnaires filled by the patients.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peri-Orbital Non-Invasive and Painless Skin Tightening-Safe and Highly Effective Use of Multisource Radio-Frequency Treatment Platform

Rousseaux¹,

Sud²

2015

JCDSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The periorbital area is the third highest-ranking area for cosmetic surgery. However, surgery in this area presents a number of difficulties and safety concerns. First generation Monopolar RF treatments in this area were usually associated with considerable pain and long downtime. In the present clinical study, we used the iFine handpiece of the EndyMed PRO, multi-source phase-controlled radiofrequency (RF) for Non-invasive, pain free, skin rejuvenation of the periorbital area. The study included eleven (11) subjects, treated for periorbital signs of aging (iFine handpiece, EndyMed PRO platform, EndyMed Medical, Caesarea, Israel). The degree of clinical improvement was assessed by the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) and subjects satisfaction by post treatment questionnaires. 91% of patients showed good to excellent improvement as a result of the treatment. Subjects satisfaction showed that 55% of patients reported that they were very satisfied, 45% were satisfied while none were dissatisfied. There were no incidences of infections, scarring, hypopigmentation, or any other serious complications.

show abstract

The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale

Cited by 232 publications

References 8 publications

The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: A Clinical Validated Measurement Tool for Nasolabial Wrinkle Severity Assessment

The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: A Clinical Validated Measurement Tool for Nasolabial Wrinkle Severity Assessment

Injectable Polyethylene Glycol Gel as Dermal Filler: 01 Year Clinical and Ultrasound Follow-Up

Peri-Orbital Non-Invasive and Painless Skin Tightening-Safe and Highly Effective Use of Multisource Radio-Frequency Treatment Platform

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About