1993
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(93)90297-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical studies of adatom diffusion on metal surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Pt single adatom, the calculated D 0 and E m are 5:41  10 À3 cm 2 /s and 0:19 eV, which are closer to the existing experimental values of 2:0ðÂ1:4 AE1 Þ Â 10 À3 cm 2 /s and 0:26 AE 0:03 eV, compared to other theoretical calculations (1:0  10 À4 cm 2 /s and 0.007 eV for EAM [27], 6:3  10 À4 cm 2 /s and 0.19 eV for Lennard-Jones potential [27]). For the diffusion of Cu adatom on (1 1 1) surface, the calculated E m is 0.06 eV, which is in agreement with other theoretical calculations (0.04-0.087 eV) [12,[28][29][30]. The calculated D 0 is 3:01  10 À4 cm 2 /s, which is consistent with other semi-empirical computations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Pt single adatom, the calculated D 0 and E m are 5:41  10 À3 cm 2 /s and 0:19 eV, which are closer to the existing experimental values of 2:0ðÂ1:4 AE1 Þ Â 10 À3 cm 2 /s and 0:26 AE 0:03 eV, compared to other theoretical calculations (1:0  10 À4 cm 2 /s and 0.007 eV for EAM [27], 6:3  10 À4 cm 2 /s and 0.19 eV for Lennard-Jones potential [27]). For the diffusion of Cu adatom on (1 1 1) surface, the calculated E m is 0.06 eV, which is in agreement with other theoretical calculations (0.04-0.087 eV) [12,[28][29][30]. The calculated D 0 is 3:01  10 À4 cm 2 /s, which is consistent with other semi-empirical computations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The calculated D 0 is 3:01 Â 10 À4 cm 2 /s, which is consistent with other semi-empirical computations. For example, the prefactor determined from the hopping frequency has been found to be 5:2 Â 10 À4 cm 2 /s when a Morse potential was used and 6:4 Â 10 À4 cm 2 /s with a Finnis-Sinclair potential [30]. With the EAM models, the obtained prefactor was 3:0 Â 10 À4 cm 2 /s and 4:6 Â 10 À4 cm/s [31], respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From this table, it turns out that, our findings are in reasonable agreement with the available data for the three systems. By analyzing our results, we remark that for Cu/Cu(111) system, the activation energy is close to 0.03 eV for both displacements of the adatom (From fcc to hcp site and inversely), which is in good agreement with that found in Marinica et al ., Karim et al ., Kallinteris et al ., Shiang, Minkowski and zaluska‐Kotur . Additionally, this value is extremely small compared with the other homogeneous systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This method describes the FCC metals well. Because of computational efficiency and fairly long-range properties, it has been used in many studies and successfully applied to a range of problems [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Recently, this potential has been applied to study thermal and mechanical properties of some FCC transition metals [36], Pt-Rh alloys [37] and Pd-Ag alloys [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%