2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There Is No Correlation Between Erectile Dysfunction and Dose to Penile Bulb and Neurovascular Bundles Following Real-Time Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean dose to the penile bulb was decreased to half in IMPT compared to HT, but again, the prediction of a clinical outcome caused by this sparing is difficult. Brachytherapy studies (25) have reported that radiation dose to the neurovascular bundles or penile bulb did not predict erectile dysfunction after prostate brachytherapy; the calculated mean maximum, mean minimum, and mean doses to 50% of the penile bulb did not differ between men who developed erectile dysfunction and those who did not. Also, in the external radiotherapy context, Brown et al (26) showed that the mean radiation dose to the penile bulb and volume of penile bulb treated were not associated with posttreatment potency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The mean dose to the penile bulb was decreased to half in IMPT compared to HT, but again, the prediction of a clinical outcome caused by this sparing is difficult. Brachytherapy studies (25) have reported that radiation dose to the neurovascular bundles or penile bulb did not predict erectile dysfunction after prostate brachytherapy; the calculated mean maximum, mean minimum, and mean doses to 50% of the penile bulb did not differ between men who developed erectile dysfunction and those who did not. Also, in the external radiotherapy context, Brown et al (26) showed that the mean radiation dose to the penile bulb and volume of penile bulb treated were not associated with posttreatment potency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Regarding PB dose and ED, there are roughly as many negative studies (28)(29)(30)(31)(32) as positive ones (33)(34)(35)(36)(37). A recent critical review of the published literature (38) concludes that there is insufficient evidence relating PB dose to ED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Moreover, a series of 147 patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy who had good potency before therapy found 3-year follow up rates of 23% of ED with 43% of patients using a potency aid. 19 The authors did not find any relationship between penile bulb dose or NVB dose and ED outcomes. The delineation of the NVB in this study was an area bounded by the posterolateral prostate, levator ani muscle, and the rectal wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…4,11 External beam radiation therapy induced ED has an unclear cause, with the literature linking radiation dose to the bulb of the penis, the crura, and the NVB to ED, 3,1216 with other series showing no dose effect to these structures causing ED. 1719 The majority of these studies were done in an era before intensity modulated radiation therapy and, in series examining dose to the NVB, were limited to anatomical definitions based on a single cadaver 20 or examined dose to the NVB with brachytherapy alone. 17,21 As technology evolves and more conformal radiation techniques, including volumetric modulated arc therapy and dose-painting to single lobes of the prostate, are implemented, 22 the ability to limit dose to the NVB may be feasible for classically defined NVB in the posterolateral position relative to the prostate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%