2014
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal radiation from dust grains in Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt

Abstract: We calculate the temperature of dust grains produced in Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt (EKB) based on the grain model for water-ice and silicate mixtures. The dust grains with radii ranging from 0.1 μm to 1 mm have low temperatures of about 20 K to 50 K in EKB, depending on their size, solar distance, and a volume mixing ratio of silicate to water-ice. We also estimate the thermal radiation from dust cloud in EKB. The result of thermal emission shows the spectral feature of water-ice at the wavelength of about 60 μm. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result confirms earlier conclusion (see, e.g. Yamamoto & Mukai 1998;Krivov et al 2008) that the blackbody assumption is probably too crude and should not be used in modeling the thermal emission of debris disks.…”
Section: Calculated Fluxsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result confirms earlier conclusion (see, e.g. Yamamoto & Mukai 1998;Krivov et al 2008) that the blackbody assumption is probably too crude and should not be used in modeling the thermal emission of debris disks.…”
Section: Calculated Fluxsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The latter is defined as a mixture consisting of a water ice matrix (with constants from Warren 1984) contaminated with 10% volume fraction of astronomical silicate (Laor & Draine 1993). This is similar to what, for instance, Yamamoto & Mukai (1998) adopted in their calculation of thermal emission of the EKB dust.…”
Section: Parameters and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The figure shows the dominant process for dust around the sun and Eridani whose mass loss rate is given by Wood et al (2002Wood et al ( , 2005. The total mass of dust in the Kuiper belt is estimated by Backman et al (1995) and by Yamamoto & Mukai (1998), who include production of dust particles by interstellar dust impacts on Kuiper belt objects. When the sun was young at its t = 0.7 Gyr age, both the mass loss rate and the total dust mass were higher than the current values as expected from the mass loss history of solar-like stars (Ṁ ∝ t −2.33 ) given by Wood et al (2005) and the collisional evolution (Ṁ d ∝ t −1 ) or PR drag evolution (Ṁ d ∝ t −2 ) of dust given by Dominik & Decin (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fulle 1992;Sekanina 1996;Kelley et al 2013;Epifani et al 2016). Dust production from Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt objects has also been long hypothesized, with mutual collisions (Stern 1995(Stern , 1996, bombardment by interstellar dust grains (Yamamoto and Mukai 1998), and bombardment by interplanetary dust grains (Poppe 2015) all theorized as possible production mechanisms. The relative balance between these hypothesized production mechanisms at EKBs is currently unclear and it is possible that all three contribute substantially.…”
Section: Outer Interplanetary Dust and Meteoroid Cloudmentioning
confidence: 99%