2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal stability and primary phase of Al–Ni(Cu)–La amorphous alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[55,33] average atomic size or overall mixing enthalpy are affected. Replacing Ni in the Al 85 Ni 9 La 6 alloy with Cu also decreases its thermal stability [90]. Small amount of Si affects crystallization of Al 86 Ni 2 Co 5.8 Gd 5.7 alloy [91].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[55,33] average atomic size or overall mixing enthalpy are affected. Replacing Ni in the Al 85 Ni 9 La 6 alloy with Cu also decreases its thermal stability [90]. Small amount of Si affects crystallization of Al 86 Ni 2 Co 5.8 Gd 5.7 alloy [91].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary phases of the alloys are also listed in Table 1. Such results indicate that replacing Ni by Co in the Al-Ni-La alloys promotes the precipitation of the metastable phase(s) in the first reaction, being different from replacing Ni by Cu where precipitation of single fcc-Al as the primary phase is promoted [13].…”
Section: Al 86 Ni 9àx Co X Lamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, sometimes the difference in diffusion rate is not the main factor. It has been revealed that replacing Ni by Cu with a larger radius of 1.28 Å can promote the precipitation of single fcc-Al as the primary phase [13].…”
Section: Primary Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…La atoms also have strong interaction with Cu atoms as evaluated by the calculated enthalpies of solution at infinite dilution, DH AB [19]. The more negative the DH AB is, the larger the atomic constraint force is, and the higher the thermal stability is [20]. According to the Miedema equation [21]: Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%