2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta04470a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thickness-dependent bandgap and electrical properties of GeP nanosheets

Abstract: Two-dimensional GeP nanosheets were synthesized to probe the thickness-dependent band gap and electrical properties, which were supported by first-principles calculations that predicted the band gap of monolayers to be 2.3 eV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primitive cell of the monolayered GeP is rectangular, and the relaxed lattice constant of the primitive cell is a = 3.621 Å and b = 21.246 Å, which is in good agreement with previous calculations implemented by VASP code 15,20,22. In order to model the GeP/Gr heterostructure, the graphene supurcell of 3 × 5 × 1 rectangular unitcell consisting of 60 carbon atoms is used.…”
Section: Computational Methods and Modelssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The primitive cell of the monolayered GeP is rectangular, and the relaxed lattice constant of the primitive cell is a = 3.621 Å and b = 21.246 Å, which is in good agreement with previous calculations implemented by VASP code 15,20,22. In order to model the GeP/Gr heterostructure, the graphene supurcell of 3 × 5 × 1 rectangular unitcell consisting of 60 carbon atoms is used.…”
Section: Computational Methods and Modelssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The 2D GeP has work function W GeP = 4.84 eV. It is noticed that the band edges of the monolayered GeP, as presented in Figure 2c, are within the values of −3.75 eV (−6.06 eV) for the CBM (VBM) obtained by HSE calculation 22. Therefore, our computations are considered to provide quantitatively reasonable results for the influences of graphene contact to the 2D GeP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations