“Thinstagram”: Image content and observer body satisfaction influence the when and where of eye movements during instagram image viewing

Scott, Graham G.; Pinkosova, Zuzana; Jardine, Eva; Hand, Christopher J.

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107464

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 75 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research has established that different landscape features elicit distinct patterns of eye movements [32,34], which subsequently shape landscape perception [35]. Berto's study demonstrated notable differences in fixation patterns when individuals viewed landscapes of varying aesthetic value for aesthetic purposes [36]. Landscapes with lower aesthetic value were found to prompt more exploration and longer fixation durations compared to landscapes with a higher aesthetic value [37].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

How Vegetation Colorization Design Affects Urban Forest Aesthetic Preference and Visual Attention: An Eye-Tracking Study

Chen

Huang

Yuan-ping

et al. 2023

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The enhancement of the urban forest landscape through vegetation colorization has emerged as a continuous concern for urban managers in southern Chinese cities. However, the understanding of how designers can effectively select the appropriate form and intensity of colorization design to align with users’ aesthetic preferences remains limited. The process of visual perception is closely intertwined with eye movements. Employing visualization techniques, this research aims to investigate the impact of colorization design on aesthetic benefits and eye movements in urban forests, considering four intensities (slight, low, medium, and high) and three forms (aggregate, homogeneous, and random). A total of 183 participants (with an average age of 23.5 ± 2.5 years) were randomly assigned to three groups to assess the aesthetics score, while eye-tracking devices were utilized to record eye movement behaviors. The outcomes indicate that a homogeneous design form and a moderate intensity of landscaping yield higher scenic benefits for urban forests. In the case of canopy landscape, both the form and intensity of landscaping have a significant influence on urban forest aesthetics. The HCI with aggregate form showed the best marginal effect (1.313). In contrast, MCI showed the best marginal effect when the design form was random and homogeneous (1.438, 1.308). Furthermore, although the form and intensity of the colorization design significantly affect eye exploration, the perception of landscape aesthetics does not correlate with eye movements. These findings provide valuable insights for design policies aimed at promoting the urban forest landscape, while also contributing to the enrichment of research in landscape perception studies employing eye-tracking technology.

show abstract