2019
DOI: 10.1111/php.13144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thomas J. Dougherty: An Appreciation

Abstract: Without the efforts of Tom Dougherty, it is unlikely that photodynamic therapy would have been more than a minor biomedical curiosity. His contributions to the field not only involved demonstrating the clinical relevance of the procedure but organizing that eventually led to FDA approval. This report summarizes his contributions to the field and illustrates the scope of discoveries that became feasible after his work brought PDT to the attention of others and to assorted funding agencies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hematoporphyrin derivative or Photofrin 1 was the first PS to be studied in detail . Its chemical structure showed a significant variation between batches and attempts to fractionate it into its individual component molecules frequently yielded mixtures as complicated as the starting material . Other significant deficiencies include (i) long‐lasting skin photosensitivity for up to 8 weeks after administration, (ii) the lack of a reasonably sized absorption band > 650 nm, and (iii) the fact that its tumor‐localizing properties are not as consistent as it is desired.…”
Section: Tetrapyrrole Macrocycles As Psmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hematoporphyrin derivative or Photofrin 1 was the first PS to be studied in detail . Its chemical structure showed a significant variation between batches and attempts to fractionate it into its individual component molecules frequently yielded mixtures as complicated as the starting material . Other significant deficiencies include (i) long‐lasting skin photosensitivity for up to 8 weeks after administration, (ii) the lack of a reasonably sized absorption band > 650 nm, and (iii) the fact that its tumor‐localizing properties are not as consistent as it is desired.…”
Section: Tetrapyrrole Macrocycles As Psmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the use of photosensitizers for bone-marrow purging in the treatment of leukaemias and lymphomas has been explored (reviewed in [20][21][22][23][24]. As such, tumour-cell-specific accumulation of photosensitizers (reviewed in [8,25]), but nevertheless partial eradication of tumour cells with porphyrin derivatives [26][27][28][29] or non-porphyrin photosensitizers, such as merocyanins [30][31][32][33], temoporfin (mthpc) [33], phthalocyanins [34][35][36][37]) and rhodamine [7,23,[38][39][40][41][42] have been reported. Preferential uptake of photosensitizers, including R123, by chronic-myelogeneous-leukaemia cells (CML), have been previously observed [26,27,43,44].…”
Section: Rhodamine Derivatives As Purging Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No short-fragment DNA ladder was detected in the few hours following PDP, and 0 % viability was usually only reached after 72 h, suggestive of high-dose ROS necrosis [103] or ROS inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation alone, where cells are dying of apoptosis within days [104]. Other examples of delayed toxicity following mitochondrial damage have been reported [23]. The model is compatible with G 0growth-phase arrest and consequential damage non-repair and cell death [105].…”
Section: Purging Of CML Progenitors From the Graftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations