2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional endometrial volume and 3-dimensional power Doppler analysis in predicting endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A fourth study examined the ability of 3D ultrasound examination to discriminate between endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia 14 , and a fifth study the ability to distinguish cancer and hyperplasia from other benign conditions 15 . All five studies reported on the diagnostic performance of endometrial volume measurements 5,6,13 -15 and three of them also on that of 3D power Doppler flow indices 13 -15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth study examined the ability of 3D ultrasound examination to discriminate between endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia 14 , and a fifth study the ability to distinguish cancer and hyperplasia from other benign conditions 15 . All five studies reported on the diagnostic performance of endometrial volume measurements 5,6,13 -15 and three of them also on that of 3D power Doppler flow indices 13 -15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No important differences were seen for endometrial thickness. As regard to the study by Odeh et al (10), mean thickness was 11 mm and 15.5 mm in the normal and pathologic groups, respectively (p<0.005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A fifth study assessed the potential of 3D ultrasound to differentiate endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia (3), and a sixth paper assessed the potential to differentiate malignancy and hyperplastic tissue from other non-cancerous conditions (10). The six studies discussed the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial volume measurement, and four also reported on that of 3D power Doppler flow indices (3,7,9,10). In the study by Gruboeck et al (6), ROC curves highlighted that endometrial volume was better than endometrial thickness in diagnosing endometrial malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve on these results, researchers added 3D PD to their studies. Vascular indices, namely VI, FI, and VFI, were significantly higher in patients with endometrial carcinoma compared to endometrial hyperplasia [40,42,43]. The difference was even more prominent when myometrial invasion was more than 50 % [43].…”
Section: Oncologymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Endometrial volume is measured using virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) or a similar software. Studies have shown that EV is a better predictor of endometrial cancer than ET [39][40][41]. However, each study has defined a different cut-off value for EV, ranging between 1.35 and 3.56 ml.…”
Section: Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%