2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional microanalysis of tooth movement during the first 6 months of orthodontic double retention

Maciej Jedliński,
Katarzyna Tandecka,
Katarzyna Grocholewicz
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, such complications can be prevented by double retention [4,16], which can be achieved through the "cage effect" of removable thermoformable splints [21]; however, increased cooperation from the patient is necessary in attending follow-up appointments and replacing the retainer if the plastic wears off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, such complications can be prevented by double retention [4,16], which can be achieved through the "cage effect" of removable thermoformable splints [21]; however, increased cooperation from the patient is necessary in attending follow-up appointments and replacing the retainer if the plastic wears off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to thoroughly assess possible changes in the positions of the teeth, two intraoral scans were made using an iTero Element Flex intraoral scanner (iTero, Temple, AZ, USA), first during the first appointment (T1) after the retainer had been removed, and the second on the first follow-up appointment, six weeks later (T2), and a third scan was performed three months later (T3). The intraoral scans' superimposition was conducted using the best-fit algorithm in an external software (GOM Inspect, Zeiss, Germany) according to the protocol described by Jedli ński et al [16]. Figure 6 presents the measurements of tooth movement performed in GOM Inspect 2021 of the differences between T1 and T2.…”
Section: Intraoral Scans and Superimpositionmentioning
confidence: 99%