2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/2873869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-step Predictor-Corrector Finite Element Schemes for Consolidation Equation

Abstract: An accurate, stable, and efficient three-step predictor-corrector time integration method is considered, for the first time, to obtain numerical solution for the one-dimensional consolidation equation within a finite and spectral element framework. Theoretical order of accuracy and stability conditions are provided. The three-step predictor-corrector time integration method is third-order accurate and shows a larger stability region than the forward Euler method when applied to the one-dimensional consolidatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though, since the explicit predictor-corrector time integration approach, considered in the present research, seems to capture adequately the complex hydromechanical behavior at large strains, there are other explicit time integration strategies (Runge–Kutta schemes, embedded Runge–Kutta schemes, symplectic algorithms, Taylor–Galerkin-based techniques, etc. [ 5 , 16 , 48 ]) with already proven capabilities in other scientific fields that should be also considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though, since the explicit predictor-corrector time integration approach, considered in the present research, seems to capture adequately the complex hydromechanical behavior at large strains, there are other explicit time integration strategies (Runge–Kutta schemes, embedded Runge–Kutta schemes, symplectic algorithms, Taylor–Galerkin-based techniques, etc. [ 5 , 16 , 48 ]) with already proven capabilities in other scientific fields that should be also considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%