2020
DOI: 10.21608/bjas.2020.135926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thyroidectomy with Ligasure Versus Traditional Thyroidectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of postoperative hemorrhage, neither group differed significantly from the other. The same result was obtained from a previous study held by Mosalam et al (15) who found that 1 (10%) case in Group A (group of traditional method) was complicated by hematoma, while no cases developed that complication in the other group (P =0.372).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of postoperative hemorrhage, neither group differed significantly from the other. The same result was obtained from a previous study held by Mosalam et al (15) who found that 1 (10%) case in Group A (group of traditional method) was complicated by hematoma, while no cases developed that complication in the other group (P =0.372).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Wound infection was lower in Group A than Group B but this difference was not statistically significant (P value =0.28). Mosalam et al (15) found that superficial surgical site infection was diagnosed in 1 (10%) case in each group, and they were managed by antibiotics in both cases. Post-operative seroma was lower in Ligasure group than traditional group as it was found in 1 (10%) case in Ligasure group and 2 (20%) cases in traditional group but this difference was not statistically significant (P =0.248).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%