Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2013
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611973402.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight Bounds for Planar Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph with Fixed Number of Terminals (and Extensions)

Abstract: Given a vertex-weighted directed graph G = (V, E) and a set T = {t 1 ,t 2 , . . .t k } of k terminals, the objective of the STRONGLY CONNECTED STEINER SUBGRAPH (SCSS) problem is to find a vertex set H ⊆ V of minimum weight such that G[H] contains a t i → t j path for each i = j. The problem is NP-hard, but Feldman and Ruhl (FOCS '99; SICOMP '06) gave a novel n O(k) algorithm for the SCSS problem, where n is the number of vertices in the graph and k is the number of terminals. We explore how much easier the pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, on planar graphs we can do substantially better. There are several examples in the parameterized‐algorithms literature where significantly better algorithms are known when the problem is restricted to planar graphs, and, in particular, a square root appears in the running time. In most cases, the square root comes from the use of the Excluded Grid Theorem for planar graphs, stating that if a planar graph has treewidth w , then it contains an Ω(w)×Ω(w) grid minor.…”
Section: Graphs With a Bounded Number Of Vertices Of Degree More Than Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, on planar graphs we can do substantially better. There are several examples in the parameterized‐algorithms literature where significantly better algorithms are known when the problem is restricted to planar graphs, and, in particular, a square root appears in the running time. In most cases, the square root comes from the use of the Excluded Grid Theorem for planar graphs, stating that if a planar graph has treewidth w , then it contains an Ω(w)×Ω(w) grid minor.…”
Section: Graphs With a Bounded Number Of Vertices Of Degree More Than Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the side of upper bounds, the improvement often stems from the fact that planar graphs have (recursive) planar separators of size O( √ n), and the theory of bidimensionality provides an elegant framework for a similar speedup in the parameterized setting for some problems [12]. However, in many cases these algorithms rely on highly problem-specific arguments [6,28,21,30,2,23,14]. The lower bounds are conditional to the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) of Impagliazzo, Paturi, and Zane [19] and follow from careful reductions from problems displaying this phenomenon, e.g., Planar 3-Coloring, k-Clique, or Grid Tiling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the 2 O(k·log k) · n O( √ k) algorithm of [19], the 2 O(k) · n O( √ k) algorithm from Theorem 1.1 does not depend on the Feldman-Ruhl algorithm. It is conceptually much simpler: first we show combinatorially (see Lemma 2.2) that there is a minimal solution whose treewidth is O( √ k), and then use the dynamicprogramming based algorithm for finding bounded-treewidth solutions for DSN due to Feldmann and Marx [36,Theorem 5].…”
Section: Our Results and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent to the conference version [19] of this paper, there have been several related results. Chitnis et al [16] considered a variant of SCSS with only 2 terminals but with a requirement of multiple paths.…”
Section: Further Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%