Tilted frames of reference have similar effects on the perception of gravitational vertical and the planning of vertical saccadic eye movements

Abstract

We investigated the effects of a tilted reference frame (i.e., allocentric visual context) on the perception of the gravitational vertical and saccadic eye movements along a planned egocentric vertical path. Participants (n = 5) in a darkened room fixated a point in the center of a circle on an LCD display and decided which of two sequentially presented dots was closer to the unmarked ‘6 o’clock’ position on that circle (i.e., straight down toward their feet). The slope of their perceptual psychometric functions showed that participants were able to locate which dot was nearer the vertical with a precision of 1°–2°. For three of the participants, a square frame centered at fixation and tilted (in the roll direction) 5.6° from the vertical caused a strong perceptual bias, manifest as a shift in the psychometric function, in the direction of the traditional ‘rod-and-frame’ effect, without affecting precision. The other two participants showed negligible or no equivalent biases. The same subjects participated in the saccade version of the task, in which they were instructed to shift their gaze to the 6 o’clock position as soon as the central fixation point disappeared. The participants who showed perceptual biases showed biases of similar magnitude in their saccadic endpoints, with a strong correlation between perceptual and saccadic biases across all subjects. Tilting of the head 5.6° reduced both perceptual and saccadic biases in all but one observer, who developed a strong saccadic bias. Otherwise, the overall pattern and significant correlations between results remained the same. We conclude that our observers’ saccades-to-vertical were dominated by perceptual input, which outweighed any gravitational or head-centered input.

Low-level mediation of directionally specific motion aftereffects: Motion perception is not necessary

“…2 makes clear that adaptation to rightward motion produced a positive (CCW) bias in the perception of upward-moving probes (top row of panels) and a negative (CW) bias in the perception of downward-moving probes (middle row). Biased functions like these can be compared to the unbiased functions obtained from the “non-frame-dependent” participants in a rod-and-frame task (see Morgan et al, 2015, Fig. 3).…”

“…Morgan et al (2015) noted that S 2 / T 2 is a random variable having a doubly noncentral F distribution. Its denominator’s noncentrality parameter is 2( p + t + μ ) 2 / σ 2 , its numerator’s noncentrality parameter is 2( p + μ ) 2 / σ 2 , and both denominator and numerator have one degree of freedom.…”

Susceptibility to Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions in autistic children: a comparison of three different methods

“…The pedestals were randomly interleaved throughout the task (i.e. a ‘roving pedestal’; [29, 42]). The location of the standard stimulus (left or right) was randomised on each trial.…”

Geometrical features underlying the perception of collinearity

“…these definitions, the probability of choosing the standard in our comparison-of-comparisons task is given by (Morgan, Grant, Melmoth, & Solomon,,2015) .…”