2015
DOI: 10.1080/1359432x.2015.1024664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time for temporal team mental models: Expanding beyond “what” and “how” to incorporate “when”

Abstract: Although often ignored, establishing and maintaining congruence in team members' temporal perceptions are consequential tasks that deserve research attention. Integrating research on team cognition and temporality, this study operationalized the notion of a temporal team mental model (TMM) at two points in time using two measurement methods. Ninety eight threeperson teams participated in a computerized team simulation designed to mimic emergency crisis management situations in a distributed team environment. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(148 reference statements)
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the cross-sectional nature of the current study and the adoption of the IPO-framework (Ilgen et al 2005;Kozlowski 2015), restrained us from drawing causal conclusions and building knowledge on the temporal aspects of team learning. We therefore want to side with the growing call for adopting more longitudinal methods (Kozlowski 2015;Mohammed et al 2015), which are necessary for further exploration of when exactly the combination of intra-and inter-team learning adds to team performance. For example, teams may first need to focus their efforts on intra-team learning in order to build within-team efficacy and interdependence, before gathering knowledge from external parties.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cross-sectional nature of the current study and the adoption of the IPO-framework (Ilgen et al 2005;Kozlowski 2015), restrained us from drawing causal conclusions and building knowledge on the temporal aspects of team learning. We therefore want to side with the growing call for adopting more longitudinal methods (Kozlowski 2015;Mohammed et al 2015), which are necessary for further exploration of when exactly the combination of intra-and inter-team learning adds to team performance. For example, teams may first need to focus their efforts on intra-team learning in order to build within-team efficacy and interdependence, before gathering knowledge from external parties.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar temporal mental model helps team members to synchronize their actions with the actions of other members; while an accurate temporal mental model helps to fit the team' actions with the external temporal demands (Gevers et al, 2006;Mohammed et al, 2012Mohammed et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Team Learning and Temporal Mental Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A temporal mental model helps teams to coordinate their actions and perform the tasks on time, and is particularly important when team members are highly interdependent, and need to collaborate and share information continuously (Mohammed et al, 2015).…”
Section: Team Learning and Temporal Mental Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first component of this definition is "deadlines" which provide cues for delineating time, communicate to members how they should prioritize their time and allow employees to plan and fit their time with the organizational context. The second component is the pacing or speed at which activities take place, while the third component is "the sequencing of tasks" which refers to the agreement between team members on the sequence in which they accomplish the tasks (Mohammed et al, 2015). We argue that high-risk environment teams in high trigger severity situations not only need to have shared team-and taskrelated knowledge, but they also must have a common understanding of the current situation and the time-related aspects of the task execution.…”
Section: Proposition 6: High Level Of Trigger Severity In High-risk Ementioning
confidence: 99%