Time Gain Needed for In-Ambulance Telemedicine: Cost-Utility Model

Abstract

BackgroundStroke is a very time-sensitive pathology, and many new solutions target the optimization of prehospital stroke care to improve the stroke management process. In-ambulance telemedicine, defined by live bidirectional audio-video between a patient and a neurologist in a moving ambulance and the automated transfer of vital parameters, is a promising new approach to speed up and improve the quality of acute stroke care. Currently, no evidence exists on the cost effectiveness of in-ambulance telemedicine.ObjectiveWe aim to develop a first cost effectiveness model for in-ambulance telemedicine and use this model to estimate the time savings needed before in-ambulance telemedicine becomes cost effective.MethodsCurrent standard stroke care is compared with current standard stroke care supplemented with in-ambulance telemedicine using a cost-utility model measuring costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from a health care perspective. We combine a decision tree with a Markov model. Data from the UZ Brussel Stroke Registry (2282 stroke patients) and linked hospital claims data at individual level are combined with literature data to populate the model. A 2-way sensitivity analysis varying both implementation costs and time gain is performed to map the different cost-effective combinations and identify the time gain needed for cost effectiveness and dominance. For several modeled time gains, the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve is calculated and mapped in 1 figure.ResultsUnder the base-case scenario (implementation cost of US $159,425) and taking a lifetime horizon into account, in-ambulance telemedicine is a cost-effective strategy compared to standard stroke care alone starting from a time gain of 6 minutes. After 12 minutes, in-ambulance telemedicine becomes dominant, and this results in a mean decrease of costs by US –$30 (95% CI –$32 to –$29) per patient with 0.00456 (95% CI 0.00448 to 0.00463) QALYs on average gained per patient. In over 82% of all probabilistic simulations, in-ambulance telemedicine remains under the cost-effectiveness threshold of US $47,747.ConclusionsOur model suggests that in-ambulance telemedicine can be cost effective starting from a time gain of 6 minutes and becomes a dominant strategy after approximately 15 minutes. This indicates that in-ambulance telemedicine has the potential to become a cost-effective intervention assuming time gains in clinical implementations are realized in the future.

Telemedical emergency services: central or decentral coordination?

“…Even with these limitations, we can conclude that there is clear evidence that centralization is economically wise. Several authors have shown that teleemergency systems are effective from a medical perspective [ 22 – 24 ] as well as efficient from an economic [ 25 , 26 ] perspective. Our analysis strongly underlines that the efficiency strongly increases if the teleemergency doctor offices are centralized, but at least under German conditions of federalism, centralization is limited.…”

Prehospital video triage of potential stroke patients in North Central London and East Kent: rapid mixed-methods service evaluation

“…The systematic review identified 47 papers that met the inclusion criteria (32 primary studies 39,41, and 15 reviews 16,39,40,47,48,53,[89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97] ; for details, see Appendix 1, Table 11). One record was a trial registration; 98 this led to the identification of a research paper, 80 which was included in place of the trial registry record.…”

“…'Prehospital telestroke'/'mobile telemedicine' is therefore identified as a promising, novel development to support clinical examination in the field by EMS clinicians, with remote support provided from hospital-based staff and stroke experts. 16,[39][40][41] This topic was the focus of a two-phase literature review, which we outline below. Phase 1 of the review was used to inform the design of research materials in our rapid evaluation.…”

Making Emergency Care in Rural Areas Fit for Future: Protocol for multi-method and multi-perspective longitudinal analysis and control group study (Preprint)

“…RenderX telecommunication specialists have developed devices in cooperation with rescue service personnel, emergency physicians, and emergency departments. These devices have also been trialed in test operations to evaluate their effectiveness and safety in regular operations [37][38][39][40]. One example is the Aachen TEP system.…”