2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TIRESIA: An eXplainable Artificial Intelligence Platform for Predicting Developmental Toxicity

Abstract: Herein, a robust and reproducible eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approach is presented, which allows prediction of developmental toxicity, a challenging human-health endpoint in toxicology. The application of XAI as an alternative method is of the utmost importance with developmental toxicity being one of the most animal-intensive areas of regulatory toxicology. In this work, the established CAESAR (Computer Assisted Evaluation of industrial chemical Substances According to Regulations) training set… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally we found dexcriptions of highly toxic substances, known as pro-oxidant or pro-inflammatory substances . Other studies have also supported this finding. , It is known that highly toxic substances tend to have a low “qed” value. , Therefore, it can be said that the values of “qed” are clearly different from those of high “qed” substances used as pharmaceuticals, and the distribution of “qed” is considered to be more extensive than this. Furthermore, the mean values for certain descriptors varied significantly across clusters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally we found dexcriptions of highly toxic substances, known as pro-oxidant or pro-inflammatory substances . Other studies have also supported this finding. , It is known that highly toxic substances tend to have a low “qed” value. , Therefore, it can be said that the values of “qed” are clearly different from those of high “qed” substances used as pharmaceuticals, and the distribution of “qed” is considered to be more extensive than this. Furthermore, the mean values for certain descriptors varied significantly across clusters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…41,42 It is known that highly toxic substances tend to have a low "qed" value. 24,43 Therefore, it can be said that the values of "qed" are clearly different from those of high "qed" substances used as pharmaceuticals, and the distribution of "qed" is considered to be more extensive than this. Furthermore, the mean values for certain descriptors varied significantly across clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, four cooperating classification models were generated for predicting and rationalizing molecular determinants driving selective ligand binding to CB 1 R and CB 2 R. Each classification model was independently derived based on different sets of training data carefully curated from the ChEMBL database (release 31) . These compound pools contain a wealth of chemical information along with high-quality experimental data for binding to CB 1 R and CB 2 R. A new substructure-based core-substituent fingerprint (CSFP) was used to encode the structural information, and SHAP values were computed to explain individual predictions. Eventually, the four models were assembled to build a multilayer classifier, which is freely accessible through a web platform designated Cannabinoid Iterative Revaluation for Classification and Explanation (CIRCE) that is provided with a user-friendly graphical interface. , CIRCE returns predictions on demand and instantly provides a detailed portable report of prediction outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younisse et al 8 provided Shap explanations for anomaly detection. Togo et al 9 provided an Explainable framework for toxicity prediction. Jang et al 10 5 and has become very popular in prediction of complex machine learning models.…”
Section: Previous Work On Explainablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…provided Shap explanations for anomaly detection. Togo et al provided an Explainable framework for toxicity prediction. Jang et al augmented Fault Diagnosis of Industrial Processes modeling with SHAP explanations.…”
Section: Explainable Ai Model For Drop Size Estimation In An Rdcmentioning
confidence: 99%