1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90338-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
128
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…CSC compositions except the high fluoride version contain zirconium oxide (ZrO 2) as radiocontrast material. ZrO2 is an inert material widely used in prosthodontic dentistry because of its high biocompatibility, resistance to corrosion, and mechanical strength 23,24) . Zirconium oxide added to the calcium silicate cement can increase the radiopacity level beyond the radiopacity of dentin, and may potentially be used as alternation to bismuth oxide 25) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSC compositions except the high fluoride version contain zirconium oxide (ZrO 2) as radiocontrast material. ZrO2 is an inert material widely used in prosthodontic dentistry because of its high biocompatibility, resistance to corrosion, and mechanical strength 23,24) . Zirconium oxide added to the calcium silicate cement can increase the radiopacity level beyond the radiopacity of dentin, and may potentially be used as alternation to bismuth oxide 25) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in cytokine expression could be due to the intrinsic biological tolerability of zirconia ceramics. Besides showing favorable mechanical properties, in particular a flexural strength higher than alumina ceramic (36), zirconia ceramic is in fact tissue compatible and chemically stable without signs of degradation during 12 months of subcutaneous implantation (37).…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, zirconium is particularly preferred in the front teeth. Zirconia has been proven highly bio-compatible in many studies [3], and the accumulation of bacteria has been reported less than titanium [4]. In this sense, the implant material should provide the needs of the patient mechanical resistance, aesthetic appearance and should have biocompatibility and Osseointegration of dental implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%