To compare and evaluate the sorption and solubility of four luting cements after immersion in artificial saliva of different pH values

Bharali, Kadambari; Das, Manjula; Jalan, Silpi; Paul, Rajdeep; Deka, Adrija

doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_153_17

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results correspond with the results of Hajmiragh and Bharali, which confirmed the higher solubility of conventional cements, but also the resin modified glass ionomer and composite cements in saliva with a lower pH (38,39). These authors report that, in addition to pH, the solubility of the cement is influenced by the storage time, the concentration of solvent in the solution, the shape and thickness of the sample, as well as the ratio of powder to liquid in the cement (39).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Evaluation of Solubility of Luting Cements in Different Solutions

Gavranović-Glamoč

Ajanović

Kazazić

et al. 2020

ama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To evaluate and compare the solubility of three luting cements in three different solutions: distilled water and artificial saliva with different pH values (7.4 and 3.0).Materials and Methods. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (GC Fuji Plus) and two resin cements (Multilink Automix and Variolink II) were used. A total of 45 specimens, 15 specimens (15x1 mm) for each cement, were prepared according to ISO standard 4049:2009. The solubility of the cements was calculated by weighing the specimens before and after immersion and desiccation. Values of solubility in water (Wsl) in microgram/mm3 for each of the five specimens were calculated using the following formula (ISO 4049:2009): Wsl=(m1-m3)∕V. The Mann-Whitney U nonparametric statistical method and Post hoc sample comparisons were applied.Results. GC Fuji Plus showed statistically significant higher solubility in comparison with Variolink II and Multilink Automix in all three solutions. In acidic artificial saliva (pH 3.0) Multilink Automix showed significantly higher values of solubility compared to Variolink II (P<0.016). By studying the effect of pH value on the solubility of GC Fuji Plus cement, significantly higher values of solubility in pH 3.0 artificial saliva were confirmed (P<0.009). The influence of the surrounding pH value on the solubility of the resin cements Multilink Automix and Variolink II was researched. No statistically significant difference was found.Conclusion. Solubility values were mainly influenced by the proportion of hydrophilic matrix, the type and composition of filler, and the pH value of the solutions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Evaluation of Solubility of Luting Cements in Different Solutions

Gavranović-Glamoč

Ajanović

Kazazić

et al. 2020

ama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The marginal fit represents the part of the cement that is exposed to the oral milieu, and this area is therefore critical as a result of the dissolution of cement and the subsequent development of secondary caries. These factors are especially important in situations where water‐based cement is used because of its higher solubility than resin‐based cements . In the present study, the marginal fit was tighter than the internal fit for all types of restorative materials used (Tables ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 55%

Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single‐crown fixed dental prostheses

Dahl

Rønold

2018

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study used a new, digitized version of the impression replica technique, namely the dual‐scan technique, to evaluate the adaptation of single‐crown fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Scans of the bare master model and of the master model with a silicone layer representing the cement layer were superimposed and analyzed using designated software. Single crowns produced using the lost‐wax metal casting technique were included. The cement space of the band width, 0.5–1.0 mm from the preparation margin (marginal fit), was smallest for crowns made from laser‐sintered cobalt‐chromium. The internal fit in both mesial‐distal and buccal‐palatal directions was statistically significantly better for crowns made using the conventional lost‐wax metal casting technique than for crowns produced using computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM). Fixed dental prostheses produced by milled cobalt‐chromium had the loosest internal fit. The results agree with those of our previous study of the same test specimens, in which the triple‐scan method was used, and imply that the dual‐scan method is well suited for adaptation studies.

show abstract

“…The sorption value of the pulp protection agents currently used is between 2,15% and 8,57% of the material initial weight. 12 Whereas in the current study with 7 days in both water and artificial saliva immersion, zinc oxide propolis has a sorption value of 40,4% of the initial weight. The value of sorption and solubility of materials in water and artificial saliva is determined by several factors, including the composition of the material, the polarity of the molecular structure, the presence of a hydroxyl group that can form hydrogen bonds with water, the water diffusion coefficient and the concentration inside and outside the specimens.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 52%

“…This physical property is closely related to one of the specifications for the pulpcapping agent, which should have the ability to produce a thin layer that can provide the pulp's first protection against the residual of restorative material, oral fluids, or both, particularly oral fluids which its presence is very difficult to be avoided. 12 The consideration that must be an important concern for practitioners is the solubility of the pulpcapping agent under the restorative material cause leakage which can lead to sensitivity and continues pulp damage. 13 The water sorption of dental cement material are important properties to be assessed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Propolis Extract Sorption as a Pulpcapping Agent

Erlita¹,

Rahmatillah²,

Diana³

2021

Dentino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This research is an experimental study to determine the physical properties of propolis extract as an alternative material in pulpcapping treatment. High sorption value is the main cause of pulpcapping treatment failure. Purpose: to analyze the sorption value of propolis extract in water and artificial saliva. Materials and Methods: Thirty disc-shaped zinc oxide propolis (15 mm x 1 mm) specimens were stored in the incubator at 37ºC for 24 hours. The discs were weighed, dehydrated, and weighed again. Immediately after weighing, the discs were immersed for 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days in 50 mL of distilled water and artificial saliva at 37ºC and then weighed for second time (sorption value). Data were analyzed by one way ANOVA for data processing in the water and artificial saliva immersion group, then the Independent T-Test for inter-group immersion in water with artificial saliva. Results: There were differences in the sorption value of zinc oxide propolis with ZnOE (positive control) in water and artificial saliva between immersion times of 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days. There was no difference in the sorption value of zinc oxide propolis between the water and the artificial saliva immersion group. Conclusion: The sorption value of propolis extract, both in water and artificial saliva immersion shows a high sorption value. This indicates that the propolis extract has not met the criteria as a pulpcapping material in terms of its physical properties, namely absorption of water (water sorption).Keywords: Propolis extract, Pulpcapping, Sorption

show abstract

To compare and evaluate the sorption and solubility of four luting cements after immersion in artificial saliva of different pH values

Cited by 11 publications

References 8 publications

Evaluation of Solubility of Luting Cements in Different Solutions

Evaluation of Solubility of Luting Cements in Different Solutions

Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single‐crown fixed dental prostheses

Propolis Extract Sorption as a Pulpcapping Agent

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About